Beetle_O_Rourke [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 26 days agoAny Dermatologist not in bed with Big Soap will agree!!hexbear.netimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up178arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up178arrow-down1imageAny Dermatologist not in bed with Big Soap will agree!!hexbear.netBeetle_O_Rourke [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square51fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepseudo@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·25 days agoNot an expert but from the name, I would imagine they descend from the Angles (Engles?) and the Saxes not from the Vikings.
minus-squarepooh [she/her, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·25 days agoYeah, for some reason I was thinking Angles and Saxons were considered Vikings but I was totally wrong on that. You are correct.
minus-squareProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·24 days agoNortheast England and the east coast of Scotland have a fair amount of viking ancestry about from all the raiding, so it’s not completely baseless.
Not an expert but from the name, I would imagine they descend from the Angles (Engles?) and the Saxes not from the Vikings.
Yeah, for some reason I was thinking Angles and Saxons were considered Vikings but I was totally wrong on that. You are correct.
Northeast England and the east coast of Scotland have a fair amount of viking ancestry about from all the raiding, so it’s not completely baseless.