seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM to Antifascism@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 month agoArmed nazis in Springfield, Ohiomidwest.socialimagemessage-square232fedilinkarrow-up1750arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1739arrow-down1imageArmed nazis in Springfield, Ohiomidwest.socialseahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM to Antifascism@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square232fedilinkfile-text
Found on reddit. I’m told the reason for their visit is to intimidate the Haitian immigrant community there.
minus-squarenick@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up50arrow-down4·1 month agoThe only good Nazi is a dead Nazi. Nazi lives don’t matter.
minus-squareZachariah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down29·1 month agoKill their ideas, save the humans.
minus-squarerocketpoweredredneck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down2·1 month agoif theres anything human left of them. I know you said we shouldnt dehumanize them, but these people have done that to themselves.
minus-squareZachariah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down18·1 month agoThat still doesn’t justify murder for what is in the photo.
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 month agoArmed Nazis are valid military targets. They should be eliminated immediately with a focus on avoiding collateral damage.
minus-squareZachariah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 month agoIn this case (Americans on American soil), wouldn’t capture be preferred? We do that with enemy combatants all the time. If elimination is better, why?
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoIncarceration costs a lot and bullets are cheap.
minus-squareZachariah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 month agoAre those the only criteria for this being the better choice?
minus-squareInternetUser2012@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down5·1 month agoThey’re no longer humans.
minus-squareZachariah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down15·1 month agoPlease explain how I am supposed to tell the difference between you (suggesting murder) and them (implying murder). Or if you’re a right-wing violence-obsessed troll, fuck off with the nazis.
minus-squaresnooggums@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·1 month agoOne is based on overt flag waving, genocide loving, pure ideologynof hatred being paraded in the streets as a direct threat to other citizens. The other is self defense against that threat. Seems like an obvious distinction to me.
minus-squareZachariah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down14·edit-21 month agoHow is killing (rather than stopping) these specific people self-defense? You talk like a cop. Shut their shit down. Just maybe don’t jump immediately to violence.
minus-squarenick@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 month agoYou’re on the wrong side here.
minus-squareTheTetrapod@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 month agoNo, you’re just being a “both sides bad” style centrist, so the proper move is to ignore your terrible opinion.
The only good Nazi is a dead Nazi. Nazi lives don’t matter.
Kill their ideas, save the humans.
if theres anything human left of them. I know you said we shouldnt dehumanize them, but these people have done that to themselves.
That still doesn’t justify murder for what is in the photo.
Armed Nazis are valid military targets.
They should be eliminated immediately with a focus on avoiding collateral damage.
In this case (Americans on American soil), wouldn’t capture be preferred? We do that with enemy combatants all the time. If elimination is better, why?
Incarceration costs a lot and bullets are cheap.
Are those the only criteria for this being the better choice?
They’re no longer humans.
Please explain how I am supposed to tell the difference between you (suggesting murder) and them (implying murder).
Or if you’re a right-wing violence-obsessed troll, fuck off with the nazis.
One is based on overt flag waving, genocide loving, pure ideologynof hatred being paraded in the streets as a direct threat to other citizens.
The other is self defense against that threat.
Seems like an obvious distinction to me.
How is killing (rather than stopping) these specific people self-defense?
You talk like a cop.
Shut their shit down. Just maybe don’t jump immediately to violence.
You’re on the wrong side here.
Okay. Kill me, too?
No, you’re just being a “both sides bad” style centrist, so the proper move is to ignore your terrible opinion.
That’s not how it works.
Okay.
No.