

Why would someone saying they can’t believe it make you ask if they think it’s a bad decision?


Why would someone saying they can’t believe it make you ask if they think it’s a bad decision?


It’s not reasonable if that’s all you know about them. But there are lots of situations I can think of where it would be reasonable (no less reasonable than the initial arrest, anyway)


It is, of course. But thats a different article.


Did you not expect this kind of thing to happen? Do you think expecting it means you respect the people doing it?
Or do you not think about any of this and just respond rudely and stupidly because you don’t like that this happened and think that I’m not expressing enough disapproval for your tastes?


I obviously don’t disagree. I don’t think it’s weird to report on peaceful protests that are undemocratically banned; I think it’s weird to separately report on the police doing normal police shit that happens when someone gets arrested.
“84 year old priest has house searched by police” is newsworthy if the priest didn’t do anything illegal. It’s not newsworthy if they did.
“Some people did something illegal which should not be illegal” is newsworthy, but that’s not the content of the article.
It’s reporting that’s just trying to play on the emotions of the readers.
yeah twoc/twocced/twoccing is a legit acronym. I realised that the supposed acronym for nonce is “Not on Normal Communal Exercise” rather than “Experience” which makes more sense in the prison context. It can be hard to be sure of word’s origin, but in these cases:


But they did join a disruptive protest that hadn’t been approved. So… that’s to be expected.


Weird thing to write an article about.
Would it be inappropriate to raid the house of an 84-year-old who joined a far-right protest that was suspected of having been organised to incite racial hatred? I don’t think so. The sole problem is the one we already knew about, which is that peaceful but disruptive protest has effectively been made subject to police permission.
bravo!
From caucasian to lobster?


like book covers for fanfic etc—that shit fuckin boggles me. Like if you aren’t doing this for money or clout, why aren’t you just sharing 100% your own creativity?
Because fanfic authors are not visual artists, so they lack the skill. But probably still want the visual appeal and associations that come with having a (non-stock) book cover.
Isn’t that the reason to share creative stuff, to share a part of your “soul” with others and hope to genuinely touch someone, across time and space?
I think that’s getting a bit metaphysical. I think for a lot of people it’s just the impulse to share something neat. The mere fact that you think it’s neat means you’re sharing something of yourself, just not on this soul-bearing level that you’re talking about. It’s like the difference between sharing a cute cat pic and sharing your true thoughts on your own cat whom you love and cherish.
That’s absolutely a backronym


Do you know the term to search for in the CoC? There’s clearly something changing here. My partner was in fact prevented from getting an alternative train by EMR last year, and cross-country staff said they didn’t understand why EMR hadn’t triggered the agreement that would allow it.


All the large kitchen appliances came with this place. I’m sure the oven is over 20 years old and maybe also the dishwasher. When I got here the dishwasher didn’t work and it took me ages to determine the main pump had rusted solid. An eBay replacement later and it’s been working for 6 years.


Weirdly I live somewhere with both private taxis and public transport :O :O :O


What’s that got to do with Waymo? It’s a taxi service. Are taxi drivers employed by the government where you live or something?
People don’t seem to realise:



Do you understand why I think it’s misleading?


Zeitgeist works well as “spirit of the times”; Weltanschauung as “worldview”; and Kindergarten as “pre-school”.
For these kind of visa routes, migration is an investment.