• 7.49K Posts
  • 1.2K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 11th, 2024

help-circle

  • m_‮f@discuss.onlineOPtoThe Far Side@sh.itjust.works2025-12-17
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Some background on this comic:

    Transcript:

    Sometimes, when you stay up too late at night trying to think of something funny, these things happen. Except to say that it’s obviously inspired by “Ghost Riders in the Sky,” I haven’t the slightest idea what “Ghost Riders in the Kitchen” means. I’ll figure it out one day. (I should have followed up the next day with “Ghost Riders in the Living Room.”)

    Also, mildly interesting to note that the original doesn’t depict the ghosts as transparent, but somebody colored it in at some point and added that. Probably easier to do with colors vs B&W.


  • Some speculation on this comic. I don’t think the PBF creator has ever officially commented on it, but it seems probable:

    As far as I can tell, Catch Phrase was a meta-commentary on how he saw the role of himself and his comics in the public’s eye. Basically, he was tired of feeling like he “had to” make a funny comic, and he burned out. Now that he’s (apparently) bounced back from burnout, he replaced Catch Phrase with something new, and less pointed and angsty, to signify that he’s not done with comics.




























  • I think the joke here is just that she’s warning her kids to stay away from the weird old man’s house, which is kind of a trope on its own, and then merged with the nursery rhyme. The house she’s warning the kids to stay away from is a squalid, rundown house as you might expect, but it’s funny (presumably, ymmv) to think about what that would look like as a shoe.

    I think the Archie references in the Disqus link are just amused by the coincidence that the random name Larson picked is close to the Archie principal, but that probably wasn’t intentional.


  • Some background on this comic:

    Transcript:

    I don’t think this ever really worked. The title on the dog’s book is a well-known phrase, but I couldn’t recall any expressions that would similarly reflect a cat’s reading interests. In cases like this, I usually sit on the idea with the hope that someday I’ll stumble across it in my sketchbook and immediately know how to handle it. This time, unfortunately, I think I forced it.


  • To be clear, I’m not finding fault with you specifically, I think most people use terms like conscious/aware/etc the way you do.

    The way of thinking about it that I find useful is defining “consciousness” to be the same as “world model”. YMMV on if you agree with that or find it useful. It leads to some results that seem absurd at first, like in another comment someone pointing out that it means that a thermometer is “conscious” of the temperature. But really, why not? It’s only a base definition, a way to find some objective foundation. Clearly, humans have a lot more going on than a thermometer, and that definition lets us focus on the more interesting bits.

    As stated, I’m not much into the qualia hype, but this part is I think an interesting avenue of thought:

    it likely won’t be possible to directly compare raw experiences because the required hardware to process a specific experience for one individual might not exist in the other individual’s mind.

    That seems unlikely if you think the human brain is equivalent to a Turing machine. If you could prove that the human brain isn’t equivalent, that would be super interesting. Maybe it’s a hypercomputer for reasons we can’t explain yet.

    Your project sounds interesting, if you ever publish it or a paper about it, I’d love to see it! I can’t judge about hobby projects being messy lol.


  • m_‮f@discuss.onlineOPtoGarfield@lemmy.world1980-12-10
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I searched DDG for “is garfield neutered” and the AI “helpfully” said “Yes, Garfield is neutered, as indicated in various comic strips and public service announcements featuring the character. This aspect of his character is often used humorously in the context of pet care.” and then linked to this SRoMG edit as a source:

    https://www.mezzacotta.net/garfield/?comic=3241

    Not a lot of actual references to go on, the 1979-11-24 strip is the closest thing:

    Whether that’s because he is fixed and traumatized by it, or unfixed and scared of the possibility remains unclear. Some other online comments say that his grandchildren are referenced in an animated story, but since Garfield’s age is unclear here anyways, it’s possible he’s fixed now even if he has had children.


  • Think it’s just supposed to be the bear’s sidekick. Something of an explanation here:

    In “Bear Police”, some naughty kids are spraying graffiti on the wall. Here comes Mr. Bear the Policeman, along with his friend, a white dove! The cop is, however, still a bear, and he proceeds to use his bear paw to somewhat graphically knock out the brains of at least one of the vandalizing kids, before he and his bird friend go for a well-deserved cup of coffee and a donut.

    One of the weaker PBF comics IMO, it’s one of the earlier ones that didn’t quite match the later style. It probably would’ve worked more to go more graphic and show the bear eating them, or show the bear in a cave with their bones, still wearing the police uniform, or something kind of absurd like that.


  • m_‮f@discuss.onlineOPtoThe Far Side@sh.itjust.works2025-12-10
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    That’s on me tbh. I have a script that munges the image and text together into a single image (since it’s plain text on the website), and the library I’m using occasionally lays out text in a weird way like this. I’ve been meaning to fix that, and the fact that it doesn’t handle italicized text properly.