trompete [he/him]

  • 6 Posts
  • 106 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 16th, 2021

help-circle


  • Die Zeit found the perfect framing device in a young man the reporter just happened upon in front of the bomb crater south of Beirut, and apparently follows him around all night. He’s perfect for the story. Too perfect.

    He’s looking for his family from one of the nearby damaged buildings (no worries happy ending). His father is Hezbollah, he’s Hezbollah technically, but doesn’t want to become a fighter against his father’s wishes. They had a fight and he’s the black sheep of the family now. He works at a hair salon and rather likes beautiful hair, no, beauty itself! He blames Hezbollah for this. He says there were of course weapons at the Hezbollah HQ next to his home. He thinks Israel is just too powerful; can’t be beaten. He just wants to live in a real country with a proper army and a president.

    This conversation with a young man who lives and grew up in the heart of the Hezbollah movement, who, as he says, is of course a member, like everyone in this neighborhood, but is not convinced, who criticizes Hezbollah so bluntly amidst a crowd of irritated Hezbollah guards, is completely improbable - and perhaps only possible for this reason. Nobody pays attention to us anymore.

    OK now they’re just fucking with me, right?











  • This is just my unqualified opinion, but from a practical standpoint of both pulling it off and not looking obvious, it would be whole lot easier to use the existing radio and hardware, together with manipulated firmware to explode these things. You’d have to put a whole second set of electronics in there otherwise, which would possibly look sus. I don’t know also why Israel would care if some of them didn’t go off when they are not in use.

    Then about the explosives. If you wanted to hide the explosives, you might package them with the battery. That way, from the outside, it just looks like a chunky battery, and people are unlikely to open up the battery because it’s dangerous. It would be interesting to have a look at a battery from this type of pager. Batteries in laptops and phones actually already have electronics in the battery package, with digital data pins so you can talk to the battery and ask it about its state and whatnot. You could therefore produce a battery w/ explosives including a detonator which looked like a normal battery, and it could be triggered over the regular battery connector. You wouldn’t see anything, not even extra wires, unless you opened up the battery itself.







  • Can’t remember any source that wasn’t just speculating about this. I don’t think there’s any evidence you could cite at him.

    My own theory: If you were to blow up the dam for defensive purposes, you’d want to blow it up after the enemy had already crossed in significant numbers, but the only thing going on there in the weeks before was the occasional Ukrainian recon unit maybe doing prep work.

    If, on the other hand, you were planning an offensive across the river, it might be smart to preempt this by blowing up the dam before you attempt to cross. Now, it would of course be total stupidity to do an offensive across the mouth of the Dnieper, even after the dam is blown. Nevertheless, the Ukrainians sent elite units to conquer and hold a bridgehead there after the flooding had subsided, and only gave up a couple of weeks ago.

    The thing was also blown up two days before the start of the greatest Ukrainian spring summer counteroffensive. pepe-silvia Coincidence?