• EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Thanks for the link, but I deleted my account years ago. No worky for me.

    If anyone could link something else, I’d be quite grateful. 👍

    Edit: here’s a link:

    https://xcancel.com/mehdirhasan/status/1835761859838038350

    Also— I don’t read her as being so much pro-putin as she is trying to be “stateswoman” and also being terribly unprepared. Just a total flop. She seemed like she was trying to be very reasonable, and she was just destroyed by the interviewer who was unrelenting on a single question that she was not prepared to answer.

    I’m not apologizing for her. It was probably the one and only question she should have been prepared to answer right off the bat. And how she fumbled it was extremely damaging to her.

    She did answer, but her answer got lost in the mess of it all. And that interviewer was being a very aggressive.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      He wasn’t being a dick. He was doing what journalists should do. If she answers with an extremely simple, “yes” every single time Netanyahu and Biden come up but literally every single time he asks about Putin she can’t just say, “yes.” Every single time she qualifies a yes or hedges without a yes. She doesn’t with the others.

    • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      She had no problem with Biden and Netanyahu, but avoids a direct answer over Putin. It is painfully obvious

          • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Well, sure. I only wanted to hear all of this in context— and it doesn’t really help her position IMO.

            It really shouldn’t be so hard to very clearly denounce Putin. She makes it seem like a real chore. Like, she has to be squeezed into saying it, and even then, it’s still a little unclear.

            I think, to some degree, she’s trying to be diplomatic, but more importantly, she’s coming off as weak to international powers that she should be standing up to. Even if she isn’t some Russian shill, she should be standing up to Putin in a resolute manner that she is failing to do here, and kind of always.

            In a very kind reading of Jill Stein, if she wants to take a more diplomatic approach to eastern powers, she needs to learn how to stand up to them. She’s a poor choice just because of how incredibly weak she is in her positions and diplomacy.

                • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  I get it, and to an extent I can appreciate it, but personally I can never give these people any benefit of the doubt

                  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    17 hours ago

                    What I’m trying to show is that, even with the benefit of the doubt, she still sucks.

                    Honestly, on the merits— she’s awful.