• Bobby_DROP_TABLES [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you genuinely think this is a good idea for Venezuela? It’s not that I think it’s unjust, I honestly don’t know enough about the history of the disputed territory to pass judgement. It just seems like a really dumb move from Maduro. There’s no clear benefit resource wise (they already have enough oil), its not going to foster any goodwill among other South American countries, if the US gets involved Venezuela is fucked, and even if successful they’re going to have to sink a lot of energy into administering the newly annexed territory (which is never easy).

      • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        I just think that a decision like this was probably not made lightly. I really doubt Maduro was just like “fuck it imma do something funny” that like libs saying Putin is evil and one day invaded Ukraine for fun.

        • Bobby_DROP_TABLES [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          Fair, but there’s a big difference between the Ukraine invasion and this. Ukraine was the result of a calculated effort to force Russia’s hand. This seems like an unforced error, and I don’t see why we should assume Maduro is incapable of making miscalculations just because he has the right ideas in a lot of other areas.

          • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            It would be nice if Maduro had an announcement making his reasoning available for everyone to see like Putin did, so I get what you’re saying. I would like to think this is a calculated effort but I’ll be honest and say I don’t really know. Could be a huge fuck up, but as of right now critical support is my default with things like this even if it is just reflexive anti Americanism.

      • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The US is not involved in this conflict

        Are you sure? What is exxonmobil again? Who has influence in the International Court of Justice?

        America is the one aggressing on Venezuela by using their puppet government in Guyana to encircle them and take the disputed territory unilaterally.

          • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Why does that matter? Should countries just lay down and let America strangle them “non-militarily/indirectly” until they’re dead?

            • Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              Another reason I’m not happy about this is I’m not confident Venezuela can win this, if it gets embroiled in this conflict it could just as easily end up a win for the US Empire cuz now they can just snuff out Venezuela instead of trying to chip away at them via more subtle means. That’s why, even if I don’t agree with Maduro’s decision here, I would still oppose US involvement of any kind.

              • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                10 months ago

                I’m not confident Venezuela can win this

                Guyana has no military.

                it could just as easily end up a win for the US Empire

                So your alternative is to let them win because they might win if Venezuela reacts? Makes no sense.

              • porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                this conflict it could just as easily end up a win for the US Empire cuz now they can just snuff out Venezuela instead of trying to chip away at them

                I’m not accusing you of this, but this is exactly the line of reasoning that every Trot and left liberal I know used to explain why we all needed to “condemn Hamas”. The unstated assumption here is that confronting the empire can only result in a worse outcome for the periphery, and so we must oppose any material resistance by the periphery for their own good.

                The only two conclusions to this line of thinking are:

                • That there is no possibility of things improving for the periphery, and so the best they can hope for is to preserve the status quo indefinitely.
                • That the only effective means of improving the material conditions of the periphery is by waging some kind of purely moral nonviolent struggle through speech and symbolic gestures.

                Both of these are just liberalism.

      • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Clearly the US has no interests in the region, that’s why they leave VZ alone and let them develop peacefully. /s