I think you overestimate the difficulty of it, especially for vegetarianism where you can get all you need from eggs and dairy. Anecdotally I have been vegetarian for 2 years and have never taken supplements and am very healthy, just ran a half marathon in 1:40 which wouldn’t be possible if I was anemic from b12 deficiency. An even larger example is the hundreds of millions of Indians who are vegetarians and have been for millennia, long before supplements existed.
You also underestimate the difficulty in a meat based diet. Every diet requires planning and intentionality to make it healthy. Meat based diets require you to pay far more attention to the amount of fiber you’re getting. Because of this many people who eat meat are not getting enough fiber, 95% of Americans, which leads to intestinal issues and cancers, which is why vegetarians tend to have better health outcomes as noted above since their main source of protein, legumes, are also high in fiber.
As for the efficiency and accessibility it takes far less resources to make b12 with bacteria then with cows/chickens. It wouldn’t take any logistical or scientific innovation to do it either, we know how to make it with bacteria, and it is far more shelf stable and transportable than meat. In general meat production is extremely wasteful and destructive putting aside the ethical arguments. Cows are one of the top sources of greenhouse gases and the demand for them is causing vast tracts of the Amazon to be burned to create new pasture land. If you ask any environmentalist worth there salt what’s the best thing you can do for the planet they’ll say eat less/no meat and drive less/not at all.
How is big pharma less trustworthy than big agriculture? The meat industry is extremely consolidated. Also b12 isn’t patented and the methods to produce it are widely available, there’s no reason it could only be produced in the first world.
For the ethical argument it is valid and depends on your own ethics / philosophy of whether plants / fungi suffer and feel pain. Either way though eating meat is still worse because cows , chickens etc. eat plants to produce meat. Due to trophic loss they consume far more calories and nutrients from plants then they produce in meat, thus killing more plants then is necessary to feed a human. If you want to minimize plant suffering then you should be vegan.
For the existing cows, I’m not advocating for, nor entertaining the absurd idea of outlawing meat eating tomorrow and having to deal with current stock. The cows that are already here are for the most part already doomed to a life of suffering, the best we can do is stop breeding them so we don’t bring more suffering into the world. The best way to stop that from happening is lowering meat consumption which will cause meat producers to stop breeding to deal with the lower demand.
You make good points, and I overall agree with you. Although I don’t believe we need to stop farming animals . I think we can continue farming them for stuff like eggs, milk, wool, etc and do it in ethical ways. What are your thoughts of meat from end of life animals?
I agree that continuing to farm animals ethically solely for the excess products they produce is an achievable, sustainable and ethical goal we should strive for.
If the meat would be wasted anyway then it’s fine to eat. Better us eat it then the maggots. The goal shouldn’t be to just stop people from eating meat, it should be to reduce the amount of animals being bred to serve our taste. If a farmer can only sell the meat after the animal has lived a long life, eating a lot of food that they have to provide, they’ll be less likely to breed them as it wouldn’t be profitable.
It presumably would’ve happened in ancient India as vegetarianism started catching on and cows became sacred.
Even if it didn’t, we’ve never reduced our fossil fuel consumption on a global scale either, that doesn’t mean it’s impossible or that it isn’t something we should / have to do.
I think you overestimate the difficulty of it, especially for vegetarianism where you can get all you need from eggs and dairy. Anecdotally I have been vegetarian for 2 years and have never taken supplements and am very healthy, just ran a half marathon in 1:40 which wouldn’t be possible if I was anemic from b12 deficiency. An even larger example is the hundreds of millions of Indians who are vegetarians and have been for millennia, long before supplements existed.
You also underestimate the difficulty in a meat based diet. Every diet requires planning and intentionality to make it healthy. Meat based diets require you to pay far more attention to the amount of fiber you’re getting. Because of this many people who eat meat are not getting enough fiber, 95% of Americans, which leads to intestinal issues and cancers, which is why vegetarians tend to have better health outcomes as noted above since their main source of protein, legumes, are also high in fiber.
As for the efficiency and accessibility it takes far less resources to make b12 with bacteria then with cows/chickens. It wouldn’t take any logistical or scientific innovation to do it either, we know how to make it with bacteria, and it is far more shelf stable and transportable than meat. In general meat production is extremely wasteful and destructive putting aside the ethical arguments. Cows are one of the top sources of greenhouse gases and the demand for them is causing vast tracts of the Amazon to be burned to create new pasture land. If you ask any environmentalist worth there salt what’s the best thing you can do for the planet they’ll say eat less/no meat and drive less/not at all.
How is big pharma less trustworthy than big agriculture? The meat industry is extremely consolidated. Also b12 isn’t patented and the methods to produce it are widely available, there’s no reason it could only be produced in the first world.
For the ethical argument it is valid and depends on your own ethics / philosophy of whether plants / fungi suffer and feel pain. Either way though eating meat is still worse because cows , chickens etc. eat plants to produce meat. Due to trophic loss they consume far more calories and nutrients from plants then they produce in meat, thus killing more plants then is necessary to feed a human. If you want to minimize plant suffering then you should be vegan.
For the existing cows, I’m not advocating for, nor entertaining the absurd idea of outlawing meat eating tomorrow and having to deal with current stock. The cows that are already here are for the most part already doomed to a life of suffering, the best we can do is stop breeding them so we don’t bring more suffering into the world. The best way to stop that from happening is lowering meat consumption which will cause meat producers to stop breeding to deal with the lower demand.
You make good points, and I overall agree with you. Although I don’t believe we need to stop farming animals . I think we can continue farming them for stuff like eggs, milk, wool, etc and do it in ethical ways. What are your thoughts of meat from end of life animals?
I agree that continuing to farm animals ethically solely for the excess products they produce is an achievable, sustainable and ethical goal we should strive for.
If the meat would be wasted anyway then it’s fine to eat. Better us eat it then the maggots. The goal shouldn’t be to just stop people from eating meat, it should be to reduce the amount of animals being bred to serve our taste. If a farmer can only sell the meat after the animal has lived a long life, eating a lot of food that they have to provide, they’ll be less likely to breed them as it wouldn’t be profitable.
this has never happened
It presumably would’ve happened in ancient India as vegetarianism started catching on and cows became sacred.
Even if it didn’t, we’ve never reduced our fossil fuel consumption on a global scale either, that doesn’t mean it’s impossible or that it isn’t something we should / have to do.