• Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      … and the American people are feckless sheep

      PS: although I must recognize that, since the murder of Renee Good, it does seem that some are waking up

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I am impressed at the amount of downvotes. The US had crossed several thresholds now which would’ve (and should’ve) caused Civil wars a while ago or in other countries.

        Downvoting the post above confirms it has not yet been understood where the US now stands.

        • BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I think it shows a strange effect about American geography. It’s really hard to organize a meaningful, resilient, and camera-worthy resistance because we’re so spread out. It’s all about congregating at big cities, like LA, Portland or Minneapolis.

          Like, if British people wanted to protest and resist in the streets, they go to London. All of them. It’s accessible. Americans can’t do that with Washington DC.

          But I’m in Kansas City, and while our No Kings protests have had not-insignificant turnouts, it’s not as easy or impactful because we had three protest sites across two-state suburban area. Can we get that many Kansas Citians to flock to Minneapolis to disrupt ICE ops? No, not really. It’s why all the major protest and ICE disruptions happen in the biggest cities of the “blue”-est states.

      • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Since Good’s murder, I am finally starting to have hope of a successful American Revolution

    • radiofreebc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      There are a lot of brain dead Albertans right now who are lining up to be completely obliterated by the US. They all think they’re going to become wealthy Americans, but the US just wants their resources…not them.

      They really need to do some homework on the CNMI, because that’s their future as “Americans”.

      They think, because they’re white, this won’t happen…but it was never a race war, it’s always been a class war.

      And these people have no class.

        • radiofreebc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t live there now, but am from Edmonton, and have spent most of my life there. All my family are still there and i visit a few times a year.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Ah. Lemmy shits on Alberta in particular so much I get defensive, sorry. Canadian Lemmy seems to overlook the exact same shit in other provinces.

            Maple MAGA exists, but it’s a pretty tiny minority. Even in rural Alberta most people are pro-Canada.

      • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Alberta

        To begin with, much of the loud infowarrior rides are also there, trying to import MAGA garbage from south of the border, asides that some of their owners are also avoiding the IRS.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s both. But your point remains, they will always be Canadians, not Americans. It’s curious to me, as a Mexican, that they called themselves Americans. We think of them, some of us at least, as Europeans who took American land for themselves and then usurped the many names actual Americans had with this generic name for white Europeans.

    • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Or they fail to imagine a situation that seems unrealistic.

      Or they can’t come to terms with it.

      Or they are delusional.

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Optimism bias. People failed to acknowledge a pandemic was happening until and even while it was happening in their own neighborhood and city…

        When the tanks roll in they’ll still deny there’s an issue.

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s inevitable. No one should trust the U.S. right now, and countries should be attempting to strengthen relations with each other to deal with the fallout that is bound to occur.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      We are already seeing the Axis form, time to make the new Allies kids!

  • citizensongbird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    Okay, here’s what’s actually happening since nobody seems to get the picture.

    The Arctic has been melting in recent years, opening up areas that were never accessible before for resource extraction (oil, minerals). This is also why nobody is doing shit about global warming, because the opportunity for profit is too huge.

    Canada has claimed ownership over the Arctic and its resources. Greenland/Denmark has claimed ownership as well. America has claimed these areas are in international waters and not ownable by anybody, so it’s a free for all. But they know that’s a weak position.

    If USA takes Greenland, they take the Arctic. That’s it, that’s all.

    Bonus: it’s a distraction from Trump’s name being all over the Epstein files. Although I’m not sure why he cares so much; his supporters certainly don’t. Like he said, he could rape a child in the middle of 5th avenue and he wouldn’t lose any votes.

    • mcv@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      And of course Russia has claimed half of it, because they have about half of the arctic coastline.

      the opportunity for profit is too huge

      Until their coastal refineries start flooding when Antarctica starts melting. Although even Greenland is already worth 7 meters of sea level rise.

      But of course all of that is for future generations to worry about. As long as they can squeeze out a bit more profit before they die, it’s all good.

      This is the most literal “après moi le deluge” ever.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      … The arctic is huge, like continent-sized. If they take Greenland, they’ve taken Greenland.

      This is also why nobody is doing shit about global warming, because the opportunity for profit is too huge.

      That’s also not quite so spooky. Ask the average Joe how much of his salary and lifestyle he’s willing to give up to prevent it. The answer is almost nothing. We haven’t, because we don’t wanna.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Well, for one thing, a car is a luxury in most of the world. Ask how people feel about riding on busses. Sometimes the answer is that they can’t for some reason, but usually it’s just that they prefer a private vehicle and no timetables.

          For another, a good potion of the population isn’t actually struggling, and has Amazon or Temu stopping by to deliver dumb stuff from China all the time. Like, that entire sector, along with meal delivery, is all about spending surplus income. I’m not talking about the bottom quarter here.

    • 6stringringer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      To be honest folks. It isn’t important that I don’t feel better about things. The more urgent fact is that the aforementioned comment is, how do they say it in layman’s terms, very important.

    • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      That is not what trump said. He said he could shoot someone in the middle of 5th Ave.

  • nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Britain and France should work together to give a fully equipped nuclear sub to Canada. My country is turning to shit and everyone needs to build nukes to protect themselves from it.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Honestly just the nukes on loan would be enough. There’s zero standoff and light defences accross the border. We could supply the uranium or plutonium to make replacements, even.

      Failing that, I really hope Carney is eyeing a redundant treaty in case NATO dies.

      • Cenotaph@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        I hope so too, but as far as I can tell Canada is being run by the second coming of Neville Chamberlain

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          The question is which Carney was the act, right? The pre-election version, or the one after? Even if he is elbows-up, doing it quietly would be imperative, so it’s not impossible.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      My dude-after the very first threats Trudeau (who was still PM then) went immediately and directly to France to borrow some subs no doubt. France is now sending troops to Greenland. Shit is serious.

    • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Just threaten to send Canadian nuclear reactors into meltdown Chernobyl style. Mutually assured destruction the messy way.

      • CircaV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh if they try to take one square centimetre they will find out the hard way what assholes Canadians are. Poisoning wells is our specialty. With a smile.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      With this fucker in power nukes wouldn’t help. He’ll just gaslight his cult into thinking his farts protect them from radiation and they start nuking other countries themselves

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 days ago

    Canada and Mexico should make a mutual defense pact. Being pinched by land wars would make things much rougher for the US.

  • BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Can, like, Canada and Denmark invade us instead? I wouldn’t have to convince my wife to move out of this shithole

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      We’re waiting until the USA economy collapses under Trump’s incompetence and the military refuses orders because they’re not being paid. Then we leisurely walk in.

    • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      We would bring scary things like free wealthfare with us. And all americans were to accept it. Nonnegotiable. Almost a dictatorship like move.

    • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Unfortunately the fix has to come from inside your own borders. You all have sacrificed way too much funding your military

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I always love the duality of comments on this topic. America’s military is a Schrodinger’s Military at this point, both terrifying and completely non-existent basically depending on what time of day the conversation happens at.

        Canadians can’t help because the military is so powerful (completely obvious and understandable) but also, like somebody up above said, “Americans are feckless sheep” for not shooting up the White House yet.

        Everybody’s a hero until it’s their life on the line.

        • tea@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Militaries are only as strong as the country’s will to continue to fight. The US had great social upheaval for a relatively low casualty war in Vietnam (<60k dead in 8 yr). Compare the casualty rates from Vietnam with what Russia is experiencing in Ukraine (180-480k deaths in 3 yr).

          I remember listening to Dan Carlin talk about how wars are typically won by the side that doesn’t know when to give up. Early Rome was this way. 1941 USSR was this way. 2026 USA is NOT going to win a drawn out, existential war. We would kill a lot of people, sure, thanks to all the weapons and guns but we don’t think we have what it takes to win a major power war anymore.

        • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Fair point, but Americans have more levers they can pull like mass striking and protesting. If Canada were to invade the US, the US would invade back, likely with popular support as they’d just be “defending themselves”

  • shapeofthings@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Am Canadian. I fully believe that within the next year he will be openly talking about invading. Within a couple of could well be done. The guerrilla war will go on for ever though, you can take Canada but you will have a very hard time keeping it.

    • tea@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Am American. We (the broad majority) don’t want Canada. or Greenland. or Venezuela. Any of this fascist shit. I’m so fucking sick of this. I want to go back to politics being boring-ish and about deciding what taxes will and won’t pay for and having actual friends whom we aren’t actively bullying. I wish this scenario were laughable, but it’s not.

      • xxam925@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        That doesn’t help at all. We are complicit.

        No citizenship ever has been in a better position to prevent their government from doing horrible things, and yet we do nothing. We wring our hands and aren’t willing to hurt, let alone die, for what is morally right. The small arms in this country are more than enough to overwhelm the entire place. We have the numbers and the weapons and yes some would have to die. This isn’t even special though, all throughout history people have died for principles, it’s just… we don’t have any.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Unless you get off your collective couches that’s all that it is: wishes.

    • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Fellow Canadian. The US has been moderately successful at third generation warfare (so long as they are part of an international coalition, they don’t do so hot on their own). They are less successful at fourth generation warfare.

      To expand, the goal of third generation warfare is outright victory in a state on state conflict. Fourth generation warfare’s goal is to make war very, VERY uncomfortable in an asymmetric conflict. There is no outright victory condition (aside from total annihilation). The USA can look forward to a very generous helping of the latter should they invade Canada.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The guerrilla war will go on for ever though, you can take Canada but you will have a very hard time keeping it.

      Which is why i’d find it “hilarious” if he tries any boots-on-the-ground shit in Venezuela.
      I almost hope he did just so murica would go though another Vietnam… even then they’d still believe they’re the Land of the fee, Home of the grease.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      The guerrilla war will go on for ever though

      You think Canadians are going to shoot mounties and cops in meaningful numbers?

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Individual mounties and city cops will be on the guerilla’s side as often as not. Resistance becomes possible because it will be against whatever new collaborateur occupation force, and there could still be a government in exile out there directing and giving it legitimacy.

        Of course, we get to live in Afghanistan but with an even harder climate in this scenario. Yaaay. /s

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I hope I’m wrong. But also maybe don’t post something that can be used against you to stop you from doing the thing.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          What makes us so different than all those highly armed and trained individuals NOT shooting ICE agents right now? Don’t fucking call strangers names, shitface.

      • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Americans and traitors, the latter of which may include MAGA Canadians. There are currently an uncomfortable number of them (including cops, I suspect) that haven’t figured out that announcing your treasonous intentions all over Facebook and Twitter just makes it easier for everyone to know who the enemy is when conflict breaks out. And as the state is usually predisposed during conflict, traitors are typically dealt with by the mob…and the mob has a far less nuanced and humane view of justice.

        These MAGA Canadians think it’s an edgy joke.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Americans and traitors

          An occupation of Canada would mostly be handled by your own law enforcement, just under new management, though I’m sure a bunch of confederate-flag-pickup Albertans would sign up too, once hiring standards are removed.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Only a third? “Believe may” is a very low bar. It’s like people who have “considered leaving” their job on the past year, because if you ever had a passing thought like “it might be nice to work there” you fall into that category.

    What I’m saying is that this poll is useless and the article is a non-story.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      You’re wrong saying that it’s a non-story. If you’d asked the question ten years ago, it wouldn’t be a third. The news is that this possibility has been born. That’s big news.

      • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        The movie Meet The Robinsons came out in 2007 and takes place in 2037. In that movie, Canada is called North Montana. I remember telling my sister about it and her saying that was ridiculous because there was basically zero chance Canada and the US would go to war within 30 years. It was seemingly completely unfeasible. Now it seems like a real possibility

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Also I really do not see the US invading canada. It’s too large, it’s like invading russia.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        Its large but the Canadians are mostly concentrated in pockets near the border.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          90% south of the northernmost part of the continental united states, international falls, minnesota.

  • Gary Ghost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Until about a year ago I would have said that therea no way our people in the military would cooperate. Now with seeing ice do all this heinous shit, yeah our military might actually do it

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Countries seem woefully unpreprared for the fallout when the US collapses even more than it already has.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    Mostly dependent on how much public attention there currently is on him being a confirmed pedophile.

      • CircaV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Mounties, cops will all be deputized to the US side. There is no way they do the right thing when the time comes.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Canadian military is a fraction of the size of the US military.

      If invaded, prospects are bleak for Canada. The US has a better chance of invading Canada than they do invading Detroit.

      Canadian citizens should arm up but I don’t think their laws allow for it.

        • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          I haven’t. There’s absolutely no need to “think deeply” about the strongest military in the world going up vs a nation that’s not in the conversation.

            • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              And you’re in 4th grade? Who the fuck immediately resorts to name calling instead of attempting to actually make a point. Loser.

              • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 days ago

                I don’t have serious discussions with anyone who sincerely believes in American exceptionalism, just like I don’t have serious discussions with fascists. I am particularly disinclined to have any discussions with an American fascist who clearly has no respect for my country or the former alliance we had with the US. My country has literally bled for you ungrateful pricks, among many other contributions over decades, and I can’t think of a single thing you’ve done but bully us.

                Discussing with your camp is never in good faith. You don’t believe in words, and there is no evidence or argument that is acceptable. It’s a waste of time to bother. Thankfully I believe you’re not representative of good Americans, who seem to have had enough of this bullshit.

                By the way you should know your insults mean nothing to me. I’ve been called worse things by better people than you (I’m sure that’s a low bar to clear), and I’ve seen who you look up to. Get back on your knees for your orange daddy, maybe this time he’ll finish in your mouth.

        • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Good For Canada. It’s a move in the correct direction for their country. In the meantime, they’re still outnumbered 30:1 in the USA of armed civilians vs. canadian military

            • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 days ago

              I wouldn’t bother, there is nothing to suggest this person is interested in seriously engaging on this topic. For example they seem to think the number of civilian owned firearms is a determining factor, when it hasn’t even helped the US to avoid fascism in their own country.

          • trashcan@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            In the meantime, they’re still outnumbered 30:1 in the USA of armed civilians vs. canadian military

            But there’s nothing we can do about that. There’s only 40 million of us.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      The USA is becoming an enemy of NATO and would sooner attack its traditional allies than defend them. And it’s looking like the rest of NATO may just chicken out if the USA attacks a NATO member state. We really need a new defensive pact between Europe and other countries in the Americas, particularly Mexico and Canada, independent of the USA. But the USA is aggressive and militarily stronger, so it’s a bad situation.

      • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        It was a pact made with the devil from the start. This is what happens when the USA gets constantly sucked up to because they are the “powerhouse” of the world. The problems where already obvious due to the flawed way everything is centralized towards this country.

        As the point stands, the leaders of other countries are to scared to stand their ground against fascist trump. Of course this may change, but the thing is; signs of inadequacy where there from early on, it’s just that only a select few really seemed to care about it.