• GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    I get the gist, but there’s a massive difference between self defence and committing genocide.

    I don’t think it’s good to bundle self defense with genocide and other war crimes.

    Everyone has a right to self defense.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s saying people that use the phrase “they have a right to self defense” when they are really just defending genocide. Like Israel blowing up a hospital because “terrorist” were in them, but they have no proof. It’s just an excuse to kill civilians.

      Kind of like people use “think of the children” to enact policies that hurt grown women or make situations that actively put children in dangerous situations.

    • Babalugats@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the point is that people defending Israels genocide user the phrase that is the cartoon… Hence those people being the worst. Nobody compares genocide to the right to defend other than people defending Israels genocide.

      • zikzak025@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        This. It’s the same type of situation as saying “All Lives Matter.”

        No one disputes the fact that countries have the right to protect themselves and their citizens when attacked, but it’s being used as a dog whistle to justify an offensive campaign of murder and genocide that denies another nation’s right to self-defense.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Genociders do not have the right to self defence. Israel does not have the right to self defence. Israel must be removed and the land given back to the people they are stealing it from.

      • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I understand your sentiment, but it’s a really difficult situation. I don’t pretend to understand the history but I think I understand that there are a lot of people that believe the very existence of Israel to be illegitimate (and with my limited understanding I tend to agree) but we now have generations of totally innocent people, that despise their government, living there. I don’t have a solution, but I can’t accept that these innocent people have no right to self defence just because they have not yet had the strength to overthrow their government.

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          The history is rather simple just as the path out. Remove Israel and have a non ethnostate in its place. Everyone there who isn’t a genocider is welcome that includes Jews, Israelis, Palestinians, Muslims, Christians, atheists etc, etc.

          • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I totally agree in theory, but unfortunately there are too many religious zealots on both sides that won’t accept this. As I age, the thing that frustrates me most is realising there seems to be something fundamental built into human nature that makes a huge number of us susceptible to manipulation by con artists that use organised religion for their own purposes. (Just in case it’s not clear - I’m an atheist and view all organised religion as a con)

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              You are dangerously close to the “both sides are the same” rhetoric.

              Two guys are fist fighting in the street. One is a trained fighter and fully armored from head to toe. He let’s himself get punched by the other, pulls out a shotgun and wastes him. The armored one is also a bully and has been antagonizing and pushing down the other for decades.

              They aren’t the same. Finding a solution is difficult because Israel made it that way. They have been consistently fostering extremism on the other side.

              • Flauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yes. Israel is currently way more powerful. But what is the relevance here?

                If there was a single state, the people would all have the same access to weapons.

                And there would still be a lot of people who would want to exterminate anyone who follows a different flavor of Abrahamic religion. And yes, those currently existing on both sides.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The relevance is that Israel isn’t defending itself. Hamas was fostered by them and they let the attack happen. They created a reason to commit genocide. The innocents inside Israel that are against the war aren’t being defending through the act of genocide. The solutions proposed would not put any of them in danger.

              • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                You are dangerously close to the “both sides are the same” rhetoric.

                I can understand how it could be seen that way - it was not intended. It is very clearly a genocide. But, I don’t think you can deny that there are religious zealots on both sides that would resists the proposed “simple” solution.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t think Gaza is able to resist anything at this point. I don’t think they are the ones holding back any solution. Food on the other hand…

            • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              There is another religion that plays an important role in this dynamic and it is corporate. They control the media narrative to maintain the status quo since they own the “respected” media sources.

              War is profitable, ethnic cleansing for development is profitable, corporate tech developed in Israel is profitable.

              • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                100% agree - that all falls into my “con artists using religion” bucket - I know it’s a stretch.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why the hell would you word it that way?

        You sound like a bad-faith actor trying to create pro-Israel talking points

        Israel does have the right to self-defense. They do not have the right to genocide. They frequently do both

        • Deceptichum@quokk.auOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Israel does not have the right to exist, so there is no right to defend it.

          • PugJesus@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Israel does not have the right to exist, so there is no right to defend it.

            I mean, you could theoretically validly say that about all countries, but saying that about, say, Palestine, would evoke blanching from most of us here.

            Insofar as any country has a right to defend itself, so too does Israel.

            It’s just that Israel has rarely acted or attempted to act in self-defense, preferring to pursue senseless and horrific genocide instead.

          • johker216@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is the definition of genocide. You’re making it sound like you’re ok with genocide as long at it’s against Israelis.

          • blimpkun@lemmy.zipBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Israel flattened Hamss, wrecked Hezbollah and the Houthis, then went and gave Iran a beating.

            Nah they cool bro, they earned the right to exist.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    They do. But they don’t have the right to preemptively slaughter innocent people.

    That is apparently reserved for ICE.