• Sculptus Poe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I would Pay $60 for a switch physical cartridge with all of their GB through GBA Pokemon games, especially if there was a way to trade pokemon with myself. I would still play them all on roms on my other devices, but I would totally buy that cartrage. But I’m not paying $20 for a digital version of just one of them.

  • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    8 days ago

    everything about this release is ridiculous

    20$ is way too expensive for what it is, it should honestly be 10/15$ at most
    why just fire red/leaf green? why not other pokémon games? ruby, sapphire, emerald, these have never been rereleased!
    why are all language versions separate purchases??? you couldn’t be arsed to bundle them?
    the only new feature of this release, and really the only reason one might want to use this version instead of emulating on another platform, pokémon home compatibility, is not available at launch and will be added later. come on.

  • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    8 days ago

    You ain’t going to jail for downloading a GBA game. And it is much cheaper than 20 dollars (except if you really want to play it on a switch for some reason)

    • Soulphite@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Well… I mean, do you remember the height of Pokémon Go?

      A 2017 study estimated that in the first 148 days following its July 2016 launch, Pokémon Go was linked to 256 traffic-related deaths and over 100,000 accidents in the US due to distracted driving. These incidents, caused by users playing while driving or walking, also led to significant injuries and billions in economic damages.

      • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 days ago

        As much as I think nintendo and the pokemon company are evil shits, I do believe overall pokemon go was net positive for humanity.

        The physical health benefit from all those people walking around, and the mental health benefits from said populations being more social and friendly with others won’t ever show a statistic for lives saved, but I think it’s reasonable to assume lives will be saved from extra exercise and positive social interactions.

        • alekwithak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 days ago

          I do agree, but it’s too bad they ran both that game and the goodwill generated by it into the ground.

    • bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      You mean the same people who in the same breath complain about the state of Pokémon and immediately follow up by saying they’re going to buy it anyway? Those people? 😅

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Because they are? How many YouTubers are playing The Hot New Thing from Nintendo right now, because they bought it? They are the ones perpetuating this shit. It’s all a feedback loop meant to suck as much money out of the public as they can.

      I can go and find at least 6 YouTubers that I subscribe to that almost always play the newest of the new thing so it’s featured on their channel. RTGame, Mo1stCr1t1kal/Penguinz0, Game Grumps, IronPineapple, VideogameDunkey, OboeShoes, hell even General Sam as much as I love his style and humor.

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Game Grumps got in trouble from what I remember using emulators on old games haha.

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I actually forgot that Game Grumps only play the newest of the new when it’s from a particular series or something.

          Why did they get in trouble? Was it with Nintendo or the fans? I kinda remember some “controversy” over them using emulators instead of original hardware, but imo that’s bullshit. Sometimes old hardware isn’t better, and all kinds of things can go wrong with it.

          • mesa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            I wish I remembered…Im spacing right now and search isnt coming up with anything. I just remember there was a small stink because some game or another was too expensive? And they just emulated it but showed one of the screens? Its been many years.

            • Zahille7@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yeah, seems about right for some of the purists out there. There’s a whole fucking subreddit dedicated to talking shit about them. It’s honestly sad.

              Like it’s one thing to have a semi-parasocial relationship and call it “hanging out with your friends” but it’s another entirely to dedicate time out of your life to get upset and angry over a goddamn YouTube channel.

              • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                “hanging out with your friends”

                That is not semi-parasocial, it is full parasocial, and you should do your best to discourage that kind of sentiment if ever conveyed genuinely.

                I know it’s a tough subject. Pretty much everyone is semi-parasocial. But describing someone you literally don’t know and just watch content from as a friend is parasocial and an incredibly delusional and dangerous mindset.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      You know there are Nintendo fans and then there are Pokemon fans. They have a reputation of not really being into games but being into everything Pokemon.

  • BoosBeau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Neither of these answers seem to address the question of why the games could not also be part of the Switch Online’s GBA collection… or why the games are priced at $20 each…”

    Nintendo:

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 days ago

    Meanwhile, I can go to a certain website, get the gba rom and even a romhack adding tons of QOL features and new stuff.

    Then, thanks to emulators, I can play it on any device, have cloud saves if I want, online multiplayer for free, in any language I like and for only $0.00

  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Because their real answer of “Because you dumb fucks will buy it anyway” wasn’t nice enough for the press lol. Seriously as long as you dumb asses keep buying old ass games from Nintendo for way too much money they will keep letting you do it.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is the real reason Nintendo is suing emulators and ROM hosts. They JUST realized there is a market for this. Took them 30+ years to figure it out.

    • MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean the game in question is the first of two remakes of Pokemon Red, and (if I remember correctly) the first official re-release of a remake of Red. I’m not going to say all of the releases are the same experience by a long shot, but it’s a little hard to argue they’re only now figuring it out.

      If you want to say that it should have been made more available to current platforms sooner then that’s a different argument.

    • Sculptus Poe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I would way rather play on a platform that allows me to save state at any time and as many as I want (Though I guess most of my devices are set up to have 10-20 saves max, but I could set them up for however many I want.)

    • iamthetot@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean, not really. Nintendo has been fairly consistent about rereleasing old titles for many many years now.

  • LostWanderer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 days ago

    LOL I just downloaded the roms and used an emulator. There’s no way I’d re-buy for the Nintendo Switch, only because I am against their current practices. Until they abandon their virtual card system, I don’t think breaking my boycott is a smart move.

  • criss_cross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Lmao hard pass.

    I’m all for buying current games and remasters but $20 for a 20 year old game (that they’re releasing the editions separately) is absurd.