• humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    A Zionazi, Israel chosen people first, rule over the US version of Christian nationalism, because that is bestest version to support war on Iran.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Religious Nationalism. Nothing Christian about them unless you include idolatry, charlatans, and whatever the bible said to keep an eye out for.

  • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The default in 'Murica is to be Christian

    I had people assuming that because I’m white and speak English, that I was religious

    People would cordially invite me to their churches, like it’s a social event

    Religion is everywhere there

    It’s bizarre to me, but most yanks are indoctrinated from birth into all sorts of stupid shit

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      watch a doco called “god forbid”

      it’s been a 40ish year long corruption

      i just wonder what will happen when this regime crumbles now they’ve had a taste of real power

      • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh, I’m old

        I’ve been watching it happen

        It’s genius, unfortunately

        Very carefully and successfully engineered

        The civilised world has always sneered at 'Murica, with good reason

        It was born of cruelty, ignorance and hate. It has never changed, but the PR campaign got better.

        • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          That’s good and very fortunate.

          Some of us had to mask for a bit but ultimately, even the people that “believe” still do everything they can to ‘circumvent’ god.

          It’s insanity.

          • IronBird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            god is an all powerful all knowing all loving vengeful god, but you can fool him out of eternal damnation by utilizing simple logical failings of human language

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I had people assuming that because I’m white and speak English, that I was religious

      Uh, what? Try as I might, I cannot make sense of this statement. The implication being: other races or cultures are not religious? Precisely the opposite of what’s closer to truth.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I’m American. People who assume my religion are weirdos and I rarely interact with someone like that. I’m pretty sure your assertion about it being related to your race is just a random ass assumption.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Depends what part of the country of they were in.

            In the north east, there aren’t many mega churches, and the small old churches are often pretty empty or have closed. But down in the Bible Belt, Texas lower Midwest, it’s fucking different and very prominent and very culty.

            On the coasts it looks more like granola churches for networking and much more humanist/unitarian. There are still Lutheran, Catholic and Baptist churches around, but not like the south.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        When the options are a greater evil and a lesser evil, hold your nose and vote lesser evil. Just don’t think that makes them good.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I don’t see what your point is here. I’m not saying that things are going great in the US and they shouldn’t be changing their approach to things. I’m literally just saying that when you’re faced with a ballot where there are only two viable options (as is the case under the American electoral system) then you should pick the less evil option. Even if it has elements you don’t like, such as also being captured by Christian nationalism. Your only other option is the greater evil, why would you vote for the greater evil?

            As I said, that doesn’t make the lesser evil a good option. If you want a good option then sure, keep working on that. In the American system that means vote in primaries, participate in local elections, get involved in various other ways. Try to influence what shows up on that ballot. Do that between-election organization as well.

            And then when the election rolls around, hold your nose and vote for the lesser evil. I literally can’t fathom what else you think should be done at that point.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              If you keep picking lesser evil, then they keep getting more and more evil. This isn’t going to change by any mechanism other than voting differently - we don’t actually use this time between elections to organize more, especially not while moderates are out to brunch. If a party’s primary system is undemocratic, then your only choice is to vote for another party - even if that party is currently losing very badly.

              The American left is losing so hard that we consider blatantly pro-corporate controlled opposition to be on our side at all. They’re not - they support FPTP because they’d rather see Greater Evil win than see Actually Good win. This has been obvious since 2000. So obvious that we say only two parties are viable, but for some mysterious reason the Democrats don’t support fixing it. Why should they?

              Every national election, we’re encouraged to hold our noses, vote for the immediate short term goal, to “buy time”. We’ve squandered that time consistently and here we are now, after 40 years of iterating the ratchet effect. What should be done at that point, and every election thereafter, is to vote for someone who opposes FPTP. A vote for FPTP is a vote for Greater Evil winning in the long term, and that’s exactly what has happened.

              • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                If you keep picking lesser evil, then they keep getting more and more evil.

                When you go into that ballot booth there are exactly two options in front of you. Well, technically, three. They are:

                • Pick the greater evil.
                • Pick the lesser evil.
                • Throw your vote away and let the outcome fall where it may.

                So, you’re crossing out “pick the lesser evil.” I assume you’re also not advocating for picking the greater evil. So you’re saying just abstain?

                If a party’s primary system is undemocratic, then your only choice is to vote for another party - even if that party is currently losing very badly.

                Ah, you’re suggesting voting for a third party. Under first-past-the-post electoral systems that’s part of the “throw your vote away” option.

                Every national election, we’re encouraged to hold our noses, vote for the immediate short term goal, to “buy time”.

                Yes, because by the time you get to the election itself those are the only two options left. It’s been winnowed down to that by the electoral process and it’s too late to have any other options by that point.

                Lesser evil, or greater evil? That’s it.

                What should be done at that point, and every election thereafter, is to vote for someone who opposes FPTP.

                In primaries, sure. For local candidates and so forth. It’d be awesome to get rid of first-past-the-post. I’ve pushed for it in my own country, where there’s at least a little chance it might happen.

                But at the end of the campaign when it’s voting day and you’re standing there in that voting booth, and there’s the D vs R choice sitting there in front of you, there’s no “get rid of FPTP” option as an alternative. Just D and R.

                Yeah, you don’t like to hear that. Tough, it’s reality. Believing in a preferred reality and insisting that it must be real simply because you want it to be real isn’t really our thing here, is it?

      • Akh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I get they call themselves Christian, but let us not pretend they follow any teachings of Christ

        • CXORA@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Let’s not pretend whe have any reliable record of Christ’s teachings they could refer to.

              • Akh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                The Vatican has miles of archives just to name one source. Do you have access, no. Do you know ancient Hellenistic Greek or Hebrew, Aramaic, Coptic, etc. to warrant granting access to study? No.

                I belong to a host of Orders and Societies that keep the secret stream and pass that knowledge to the next generation.

          • DokPsy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            The records we do have, reliable or not, show what they should be following. Certain versions of the source material even set his words in a different color for clarification. They do not follow these super basic teachings of “be kind to everyone”, “be kind to strangers to your land especially since you were once strangers”, “don’t listen to people who try to lead with fear mongering”, “help those who are less fortunate instead of following fortune”, etc

            We can debate the reliability of the sources for the teachings but that is the standard they themselves say they follow. And they do not.

            • CXORA@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Things the character of jesus did in the bible:

              • treating non Jewish people worse than Jewish people.
              • break up families
              • encourage followers to anoint him in perfume instead of giving to the poor.

              Looks like trumps following Jesus’s actions pretty well.

        • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Although it’s not traditional, it still is a religion. Only difference is title.

          They’re the same as Islamic extremists, uncannily in every single way, like it’s intentional.