• Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 days ago

    this is an articulated policy that is far to the right of even the fascists who are actually in congress. her foreign policy advisor was quoted as attending a pro-Israel demonstration in 2024. so she’s a Palestinian candidate with a zionist foreign policy advisor. if i’m being charitable, this mostly strikes me as an ignorant young person being easily swayed by an AIPAC advisor to their own detriment. it’s almost certainly too late for her to make it out of this campaign, but it might still be interesting to see if she doubles down or hard pivots away from this. the statements given so far from her campaign are likely written by the same zionist foreign policy guy.

  • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 days ago

    What do these people think is going to happen to Ukraine’s ethnic Russians if they’re forced back into Ukraine? Let’s not even get into the west’s ongoing pillaging of the former USSR wherever they can get away with it, which definetely isn’t what this is all about. Why do they feel so strongly about this situation they also have no interest in examining?

    I feel like I’m going crazy because I can remember widely televised events, like the collapse of the USSR, which happened within the lifetimes of most of the political class.

    • hello_hello [undecided, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 days ago

      What do these people think is going to happen to Ukraine’s ethnic Russians if they’re forced back into Ukraine?

      They will not think anymore. The ideology will be changed and Ukraine will become a distant, hard to remember memory just like Libya, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia…

      Do not underestimate the ability of settlers to be able to compartmentalize the world so effectively that all violence becomes buzzing static.

      which happened within the lifetimes of most of the political class.

      Don’t also underestimate the ability of settlers to hold a grudge and be paranoid.

    • cornishon@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      You don’t understand, she only supports the dream of Palestinian self-determination, as in, she wants them to keep dreaming.

    • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Cia-kitted out deathsquads for opposers of genocide, reduced discount on deathbots for perpetrators of genocide, truly crazy work here.

    • hello_hello [undecided, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      I envision a two-part credible deterrence plan that turns Taiwan into a “porcupine” too costly for the PRC to invade, by providing them with weapons to defend themselves and committing to actually defending the island if they do invade.

      puzzled deterrence plan is just doing what the US has been doing as policy but with none of the political subterfuge that made the strategy consistent in the first place?

  • prole [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    I swear USAian “progressives” live in a vibes based reality. Zero consistency between their domestic and foreign policy positions.

    • dead [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      She posted an update on her bluesky account around 5 hours ago and I don’t think the clarification helped. She denies being an interventionist and says that she fired the advisor from her team. However she says that she still wants the US to sell arms to Ukraine and Taiwan. She even made a statement that US should end the “strategic ambiguity” policy on China, to adopt a firm Taiwan separatist policy.

      You can’t really put her into a box because her opinions are uniquely incorrect. She was endorsed by AIPAC Tracker, the anti-AIPAC group, on February 26 2026. She dominated the primary debate with anti-Israel positions. During the debate, she mocked AOC’s “offensive vs defensive weapons” defense of Israel spending and then the very next day says that the US needs to provide defense to Taiwan. The logic is incoherent.

      She really is doing vibes. The closest thing I can compare it to is Vaushism. I compare her to Vaush because they are both very online and Vaush had a positon around 7-8 years ago that he believed that the US should invade Israel to protect the Palestinians. Similarly, Kat seems to think that Israel’s crimes are somehow separate from the US. I think this way of thinking comes from a delusion that the US has ever been a benevolent force around the world.

      • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s actually relatively safe to accept couple of dozens anti entity dems, who support all other foreign policy imperialism (including venezuela ffs), then, when votes to maybe stop selling arms to entity inevitably fails, but to sell to taiwan succeeds you can say see even leftists agree.

        Real interventionism position is supplying long range missiles to houthis and palestinians, for some mysterious reason i dont think self determination work there for her

  • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    we are never going to vote our way out of this foreign policy. All democrats are cowardly, afraid to speak out against unpopular policies and are therefore controlled opposition, at best. Bloodthirsty cooperators, at worst.

  • onwardknave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    Here’s hoping this Mermel chud is misrepresenting Kat, because she’s had some decent takes, electoralism aside.