• @0xtero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    54 months ago

    It’s good that they’re not selling to Tencent. But it’s a shame they’re not selling.

  • gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    never, not for a second, did I think this could happen.

    7/10 troll though

  • soli
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m unironically disappointed. I’d take any new direction at the moment, I’ve already been pushed past the point where it wouldn’t make a meaningful difference to me if it got worse. Even a change with a low chance of getting better is worth it over a guarantee of remaining shit.

    • Fushuan [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      Hasbro owns wotc, wotc owns dnd. Hasbro can’t sell dnd, they would need to sell wotc and that’s not a good move because MTG is a money making machine afaik. If anything Hasbro could order wotc to sell dnd, but it would be wotc selling it.

      • @Overzeetop@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        Whether you take the stick out of your dog’s mouth or you tell the dog to give it to you, you’re the taking the stick. Breaking up and selling off IP is exceedingly commonplace.

        We’ve already established they are whores, Tencent has simply been unsuccessful, so far, in negotiating their price.

        • Fushuan [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Cool. I was explaining that hasbro and wotc are the same thing for this matter. They were apparently confused. Idk why you are making this point when I was clarifying them their confusion.

  • 6 months from now: “We didn’t sell it, we granted them a non revocable permanent license to be the exclusive producers of D&D content, but we still receive a royalty fee and have no control over it”