cm0002@europe.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 16 天前It's just a questioneurope.pubimagemessage-square136linkfedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageIt's just a questioneurope.pubcm0002@europe.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 16 天前message-square136linkfedilink
minus-squareTheRealKuni@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·16 天前Technically if he killed all apes killing all humans would be part of that process.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·16 天前That’s technically still within the “at least two” range 😉
minus-squareFedizen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·16 天前The best kind of correct is where somebody sees the error of their ways and becomes a better person and its because you were goddamn right. ‘Technically correct’ is , at best, the 3rd best kind of correct.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·16 天前no, the best kind of correct is when you find four stamps.
Technically if he killed all apes killing all humans would be part of that process.
That’s technically still within the “at least two” range 😉
The best kind of correct.
The best kind of correct is where somebody sees the error of their ways and becomes a better person and its because you were goddamn right.
‘Technically correct’ is , at best, the 3rd best kind of correct.
no, the best kind of correct is when you find four stamps.
Hermes Correct, lol