• the idea that most people are voluntarily internally migrating in the US to pursue preferable public institutions is like beliving that most people are evicted because they prefer to be unhoused.

    a whole shitpot full of people are leaving an apocalyptic community and chasing the promise of a job. the capitalists are luring them–often under false pretenses–into the places where the workers have the least political power.

    there are people moving to friendlier and more tolerant spaces, to be sure, but their personal risk is mitigated by their class-position and income level.

  • 9to5 [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 days ago

    Libs are completely detached from reality. Even if we for a moment, assume a left-wing candidate say Mamdani for examples sake…

    becomes president, he is (sadly) not gonna enact Stalinist purges. Instead, he’ll implement some vaguely socdem policies and that’s it.

      • 9to5 [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 days ago

        I´m assuming the best possible outcome atm under electorialism…which ofc wouldnt be socialism. But some very basic socdem policies. I dont think a better outcome is possible under the current circumstances. I will totally admit im not thaaat in touch with US politics. So I will be open to challenge on this point.

        • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          10 days ago

          there is no real pressure from the left on any of the western political establishments, so they’re all freely wallowing in chauvinist austerity with <country> characteristics pretty much.

          they’re clearly more attached to their white supremacy than to their welfare.

        • CupcakeOfSpice [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          I wish it weren’t the reality that conditions must get even worse for revolution to happen. I live a relatively comfortable life so long as my parents remain alive. Once they pass, though, straight down the poverty hole. But too many people still see themselves as temporarily embarrassed millionaires and not as systematically barred from wealth. Maybe conditions don’t need to worsen if people were informed, but even where people are willing to teach, so many are unwilling to listen. I know there’s that essay about how brainwashing isn’t really a thing like we think of it, but I think it still has some truth to it.

        • Lussy [he/him, des/pair]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          possible under the current circumstances.

          The conditions are actually great but the culture is absolutely rancid. If you look at the the circumstances leading up to the Russian Revolution, socialists were concerned the proletarian base was far too small in numbers and the country far too agrarian and detached from capital to bring about a revolution. What we have mown is a population that is overwhelmingly made of real proletariat as far as their relation to capital is concerned but and I’m sorry since this is such a touchy subect, white supremacy is so pervasive and takes such extreme precedence in American (including leftist culture) here that any proletarian revolution will be severly weakened. Yes, it is racism that is the biggest hurdle overcome. Class consciousness is actualky fairly prevalent lest it cross racial barriers and then suddenly people want to establish divisions.

      • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 days ago

        Bernie is a dirty word, and deservedly so, but the democratic establishment went nuclear against him in 2020

        And he’s only mildly left of center

        Any FDR analogue would get shot before they got that far

      • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 days ago

        I wonder if that could happen with a politician who has FDR’s charisma. Bernie kind of didn’t have it. He was liked for his policies but wasn’t exactly the “I could hang out with him and have a good time” kind of guy that Americans seem drawn to when voting

    • ryepunk [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think it’s more a case of “I’ve been a malignant brain tumor in your head for years and now you want to kick me out of my home? So much for the tolerant left.”

      This is simply those who are benefiting from the status quo not giving a shit about continuing it so long as they remain unaffected. Which hey maybe they’ll be fine and it never will. But that’s not most people, and so when the end comes for these libs and they cry about how we’re as bad as the right, we can only tell them to line up and eat a bullet, they had plenty of chances to turn away from the path they took.

  • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 days ago

    Anyone presenting “murderous mob rule” as a bad thing is counting on you assuming you’re a victim of the mob and not part of it. You must imagine yourself a part of the murderous mob.

    • CupcakeOfSpice [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      I dunno. An actual mob could be bad. If they were disciplined and informed, then it might work, but then you’ve essentially built more of a militia than a mob. Maybe I’m just quibbling over wording, though…

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 days ago

    These people always talk about how the left are scary because their “psychotic policies” will ruin everything somehow, but they can never articulate why beyond vaguely gesturing at “muh free market” or saying that “socialism is bad because (describes something that happens under capitalism).”

    Also if these policies have never been implemented, how do they know they’ll never work?

  • Trioxin@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 days ago

    You gotta love liberal logic… Apparently, people are moving to MAGA states to escape “psychotic” progressive policies that haven’t yet been implemented.

  • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    You only fail to recognize this because their psychotic policies haven’t yet been implemented.

    Sorry for a reddity “ackshually this is a logical fallacy” but this is exemplary of begging the question: posing a question, then “proving” it to be true by tacit assumption that it is true. They set out to prove that socialists are worse than fascists. Because, ostensibly, socialism has never been tried, they then assume that it would be worse, lacking any evidence and relying on supposed common sense. The argument reduces to: socialism is worse than fascism because it is assumed to be so.