Kay, well first off it’s not “non-consent” it’s rape when you don’t have a “consentual” in front of it and there’s no indication they consented.
Second the man in case is literally a passive observer within their own body.
Although that’s assuming he’s using the mind-control version of “being Ratatouille’d” instead the actual version which is just being coached but if it’s that version the whole question is just dumb, and that’s impossible.
Right, but what they’re saying is that the human may be powerless, but he’s not passive.
It’s almost closer to non-consent, in that sex is being done “to him” without his participation. I’d say.
Kay, well first off it’s not “non-consent” it’s rape when you don’t have a “consentual” in front of it and there’s no indication they consented.
Second the man in case is literally a passive observer within their own body.
Although that’s assuming he’s using the mind-control version of “being Ratatouille’d” instead the actual version which is just being coached but if it’s that version the whole question is just dumb, and that’s impossible.