• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not, have a pretty high double income. But, a lot of my friends are. I’m starting to notice things getting more expensive, but I was pissed off before that.

    I don’t have to be struggling myself to be upset at how things are going. I guess not everybody is like that.

    • Maltese_Liquor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      My situation exactly. I get pissed off thinking about how unaffordable everything is for the majority of people right now.

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have been rather fortunate, and well paid (~$120K after taxes and savings). Even 3 years ago, I didn’t have to think about money day to day. I was brought up with a very modest lifestyle, so the things that feel extravagent to me were affordable in that context.

    Today my wife and I eat out less, shop for groceries differently, and plan things that used to be a small purchase more carefully. It’s not a struggle in the important senses, but I have a clear feeling of “it’s going to get worse”, and I want to make lifestyle adjustments ahead of that rather than falling behind it.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been unemployed since 04-2025, and while I still have a long way to go, my savings are starting to dwindle. The job market is tough for coders that find generative AI, wasteful, unethical, and a copyright hazard, in addition to not being much impressed with the output, even from tests earlier this year. I wonder if the new convenience store needs people.

  • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not struggling perse but yeah shit has gone up way more than my pay check. Paying double for groceries what I did a few years ago, paying 50% more for gas than I did a year ago electricity doubled. Pay went up a few percent…

  • adwijoma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not sure anyone asked you yet… tell us your story. Where you living and what’s the sitch?

  • ThePuy@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cost of life is a huge factor, I live in Italy, our paychecks are very thin but, especially in the southern regions, cost of life is relatively, especially if you don’t have to travel too far for work.

    I’m able to save a few hundred euros per month (my paycheck is a net of about 1700€).

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    3 days ago

    One thing I’ve noticed is that movies and TV shows don’t use exact amounts of money anymore.

    ‘The Rockford Files’ always talked about Jim’s $200.00 a day fee, and characters would say things like ‘Hey, this is a fifty dollar jacket’ or ‘That house must have cost $100,000.’

    The $5.00 milkshake was a big plot point in ‘Pulp Fiction.’

    Prices are going up so fast that what was unreasonably expensive when the script was written will be the norm by the time the show gets aired.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      I noticed that when watching How I Met Your Mother as a teenager, they almost always avoid naming specific amounts of money. The narrator might replace an amount of money with “crapload” or the characters might show eachother a money offer on a piece of paper. Older shows like All In The Family, made in the 70s, frequently mention specific amounts of money but now, with inflation, those amounts of money sound laughably low. Bread for 11 cents? I always figured modern shows avoid mentioning specific amounts of money to try and keep it timeless so in the future people won’t laugh at what was considered a high or low amount of money at the time

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      To be fair, they’re trying to make “evergreen” content, meaning it stays funny/meaningful/believable/etc. no matter how far into the future that you watch it.

      That wasn’t really a thing until the 90s though. Probably started with The Simpsons

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Everytime i manage to save a few thousand and think im adding to my savings, suddenly we need a root canal, i blow a tire, doctor wants an MRI because he felt something odd… and poof, all my savings are gone.

    • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I literally refuse to look at our bank balance. The moment I look and think “oh, that’s better than I expected” then the AC dies, or our roof starts leaking and needs replacement, or some other bullshit happens to consume every last penny we have.

      • LordCrom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I always thought i was 2 paychecks away from being homeless.

        Now im also worried about the C level morons saying AI can do my job and let me go. They already require everyone use AI to gen code. Eventually, they will expect AI to architect the product too.

        • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          On the plus side, I have been in the biz long enough to have heard the “developers are a thing of the past” speech often enough to realize it’s bullshit. Unfortunately, I have also been around long enough to know that the idiots in the C suite will use any excuses to cut people loose if they think it can get them even $1 more on their next bonus. I also have never ever seen a dev let go because something came along that made them more efficient, quicker, and able to do more work in the same amount of time. What happens instead is that the already “overly optimistic” time lines get even shorter and more unrealistic.
          The short of it is, if they let you go, it wasn’t because of AI, it’s something that they were planning on doing anyway.

          I know that doesn’t really help the anxiety, but understanding that can change how you react. For instance, rather than being upset with being forced to use AI. Lean into it. Learn what it can do and what it can’t. Fucking abuse the credits that they are paying for. When you run out, ask to be moved up to the next AI tier/usage allowance, and then do it all over again. Do shit like running 2 AIs on the same job and seeing who gets closer. Set up tests that have AI run these comparisons for you. Have AIs run subagents that rubber duck, review, test, verify, ect., the entire work ticket from end to end. Work on augmenting those skills that AI fails at, and add AI expert to your resume (because that is the next bullshit thing that companies will expect on resumes). But the big difference between you and everyone else will be that you have some real insight and experience to talk about with confidence.
          And if your learning curve happens to cost them so much $$ that the AI vs employee cost difference begins to rapidly shrink, well that’s not really a bad thing for you either.

  • Somebody_Else@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Everyone except the already very wealthy yes.

    Elect Republicans, get republican policies.

    The country still hadnt really recovered from Reagan, then we got Bush, then we got Trump.

    Obama and Biden could only do so much to stop the dumpster fire, and Nazis are famously bad for the economy.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Everyone except the already very wealthy

      I think that’s not quite right. I think there is a (now approaching vanishingly small middle class) which goes from like top 10% but less than 2% or 3% earners who are still doing ok. This is the household income at like 175k to probably… Idk 300k?

      Compared to 40k/yr yeah that’s very wealthy, but compared to 600k+ it definitely isn’t.

      My main point being that “very wealthy” is very VERY relative.

      • TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        As someone making a household income of 200k, pre COVID was wonderful, actually didn’t have to worry about even thinking about money, now though, shit is getting thin… if it’s that way for me I feel horrible for everyone else less well off. Really is a shit show when 6 figures can’t secure you from having to go paycheck to paycheck.

        • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean yeah by the time you’ve got 36k (or more) for mortgage, 35k for daycare, if 200k pre tax and married 30k to the fed, 20k groceries now probably, 10k for car payments (presuming 2), then state and property taxes, insurance, maintenance, clothes, diapers maybe, benefits, gas (probably idk we went electric), yeah I could see how that money goes fast.

          It’s definitely first world problems because it beats renting and 3 jobs and grandma watches the kids, but to do all the things you’re “supposed to do” by 1950s standards you probably need something north of 250k/yr.

          • TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah I’m lucky that my kids are full grown though they both still live with me because the job market is ass and my oldest is low functioning, and my wife is disabled, so still taking care of all 4 of us off my paycheck and my wife’s disability, I’m going electric next year probably(if my work bonus comes through) though I’ll still have to buy my youngest’s gas for his trips to college etc. really hoping things make a change for the better, else I’ll probably never retire, and I’ll still be housing my kids until they inherit the place.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Everyone except the already very wealthy yes.

      That’s not true

      EDIT: The downvotes for these three words, which are objectively correct, are so stereotypically Lemmy 😆. These people are addicted to ruminating in misplaced hopelessness

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    No, not personally.

    But I don’t live in the US (so healthcare costs are not much of an concern, despite me being disabled) and know I am incredibly lucky. Is it economically worse? Fuck yeah.

    I am self employed/have my own company and I am also blessed with a high earning (and in every other aspect awesome) wife who brings in the main income (she works full time, I normally would work 70%).

    Two years ago I had 5 full time slots(filled by 7 people), now I am down to 3. Being unable to renew contracts with people at the beginning of the year broke something in me. It’s not their fault. They did their best. While I sure could have done some things differently I am somewhat sure by now that in the broad picture I could not have done much to save their jobs - I already have reduced my own payout to the legal minimum (less than 50% of my already average theoretical wage) and used loopholes to even pay nothing to me for half a year. But cutting costs only goes so far if not enough new projects come in.

    My clients are mostly healthcare and public services and these sectors are forced to massively cut costs due to our incompetent neocon government.

    The only thing that lets me sleep at night easier is the fact that by now I could “recommend” all affected people (who wanted that) into new jobs, so none is left unemployed.

    While it hasn’t been direct make me struggle personally I am struggling with my company.

    Which sucks balls,especially considering seeing how competitors get huge grants just for “being in the right party”,etc.

    We are also otherwise very lucky - We (well,half of it is owned by the bank,but who 's house isn’t) own a house - but it’s an three apartment building we simply live in one. The other two apartments are rented out (below median rent and far below what I might get if I push things) and our apartment is rather, well, mediocre. But that’s okay. It’s mainly meant as a way to invest money I made when younger by doing some incredibly risky but lucrative jobs. And to make sure we don’t need to bother with another landlord ever again. We just liked the location, the age (it’s over 70 years old) and the property - and have now have a relationship with our two other renters that is basically “live and let live”. They know they can simply knock on our door if something’s wrong and have profited by the modernisation of some core things, but also don’t bother me with bullshit.

    The rent we now receive will go to the bank for at least two more decades,so it’s not something that helps us financially now - but it might help my kiddo one day.

    So yeah. I am still incredibly lucky.