• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 小时前

    That’s still leaves you dependent on a corporation. I prefer a world where they no longer exist because it isn’t economically viable anymore.

    • ∃∀λ@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 小时前

      You’re still dependent on Adobe if you use a clone of their software which has been cleanroom reverse engineered and re-implemented. And then it needs to happen all over again when Adobe releases a new version. It’s just a Rube Goldberg way of getting Photoshop and the clone is probably a buggy mess.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 小时前

        It’s not a copy of adobe’s code, it’s all new code that’s simply implements the same features. So Adobe releasing a new version won’t have any effect.

      • Aeder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 小时前

        If you get enough people to move to the clone, that stops being true though. The clone gets to decide the direction from that point onwards.