After Democrats’ historic victory, why is this how Hakeem Jeffries is responding?

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries isn’t interested in seeking impeachment charges against President Donald Trump.

Speaking on MS NOW’s Morning Joe Wednesday, Jeffries laid out his priorities for his party’s newfound leadership in the House of Representatives.

“The American people don’t want us to get even. They want us to get things done on their behalf because life is way too expensive,” Jeffries said.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Half of Congress would probably be perfectly happy caucusing with the other team. They don’t care and tout whatever party line gets them paid. AIPAC and MORON-PAC (i.e. MAGA pocketbooks) have been very lucrative partnerships for them.

      All I’m saying is it’s probably all a dog and pony show for Jeffreys. He probably has no interest or stomach for a protracted fight when they can just coast and give some lip service.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        because he would have to actually do something if has to even “entertain” some accountability, the files, and even the bbb.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah it’s always “take responsibility for your actions” whenever you do something they don’t like (even if it was innocuous), but when you expect them to face repercussions for being narcissistic abusers, then suddenly it’s “Don’t be so vindictive! I can’t believe you’re holding a grudge. How petty. Revenge won’t solve anything! Let it go, it’s water under the bridge.”

      While new water continues to flow under said bridge unimpeded…

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    ·
    7 days ago

    Anyone who looks at last night and says “voters want Democrats to work with Republicans” deserves a kick in the groin.

    • BillionaireStew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, you don’t understand. Hakeem Jeffries already made plans with Jared Kushner to move forward together so the nation can heal.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 days ago

        Hakeem Jeffries made plans with Kushner to squeeze all he can for Israel over the next 2 years before he gets ejected at the primaries.

    • shartgargle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      At the very least, we deserve our tax money back that he stole from us. Every single state secret that he sold should be monetized and redistributed.

      • RandomHugs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        What are you even on about… Didn’t you receive your stim check, personally signed from big daddy himself already? Ya’ll would’ve received another $5000 bribe payout! Now try asking dems for the same!

    • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Like I’ve been saying. Justice will not come from The Democratic Party. You want justice? You want change? Then do as the labor movements did in the 1920’s and 1930’s! Get organized, and get armed!

      That’s the only way to get the justice and change we deserve. Anything less than and they are just going to keep tugging our leashes.

      • seagull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Me to the cops, when I’m caught doing 120 mph in a 35: “Look, maybe you want to get even at me by throwing me in jail, but what does petty revenge accomplish? Be the bigger man here, and for the good of us all, let’s just move forward.”

      • PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        What really pisses me off is that even by denying his framing, we’re helping feed it with the subtext “but is this pursuit of accountability tinged by a desire for revenge?”, which subtlely invalidates peoples’ legitimate rage.

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    7 days ago

    This asshole needs to go and he can take Schumer with him: Holding powerful people accountable for their numerous and wildly egregious crimes isn’t “getting even”.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      One might even say that Jeffries and Schumer are some of the powerful people who need to be held accountable. Hashtag NotAllDemocrats /s

  • Blibly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    7 days ago

    He’s right, I don’t want even. I want fucking annihilation. I want to drop the hammer on these chuds so hard they can’t get elected until the next century. I want them to think twice about ever doing it again. I want them scared.

    And you can do that while also making life fair and affordable. These are NOT mutually exclusive goals. In fact they are very much connected.

    Do both or resign ya chucklefuck.

    • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s just how our oligarchs and their minions think. To them its not “justice” for the crimes they committed against humanity, it’s “getting even”.

  • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 days ago

    So let me get this straight. They shit on our right to due process, they throw people into camps without said due process, they kill people in broad daylight. But there is no priority for impeachment or justice…

    So this is the rope I gave them to hang themselves with by voting blue. This is why I said voting was not going to be enough, and why we cannot stop putting pressure on our politicians even if some of the blue need to be taken to the wood chipper like all of the reds need to be,

    Be fucking angry, this should be infuriating.

  • Ooops@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 days ago

    “We have won the election, so we obviously don’t need to change or do anything and just keep everything as it is…”

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      that’s the thing, republicans need democrats to stay as they are. Republicans make everything worse, and democrats are the lesser evil people vote for to feel like they’re making a change but all democrats do is hold the fort and make a couple of minor tweaks here and there to show they care. 2 party systems are so easy to game.

      • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Which is why organizing and getting armed will do far more good, even if in the end, it just ends up being used as a big stick while we speak softly. They don’t feel the need to do anything because they don’t fear us.

        Edit: typos.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hakeem Jeffries wants democrats to lose in 2028.

    Trump is like a festering wound.

    Jeffries would have you running around, treating the fever, the fatigue. Maybe managing the pain. All the other things. But he’s not dealing with the festering wound.

    Ultimately everything we’re dealing with, that be would say is a priority is from the corruption and abuses of Trump, the republicans, and the oligarchs.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hakeem Jeffries wants whatever the Mossad handler that implanted him in his seat wants him to want. And yes that’s for democrats to lose in 2028, because Israel knows there is no world where a pro-israel democrat wins.

    • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nurses are great for recovery but not when you need a surgeon to cut out the root cause.

  • laranis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    There it is, folks. The Democratic party apathy we knew would come.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad we have some check and balances back. But anyone who thinks things will turn around in January need look no further than this one comment.

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Justice, and an end to the corruption isn’t “getting even”. Get this guy out of there, primary him if you have to! Voters are done…

    • uen3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t think Jeffries needs to be impeached. I think the Democratic Party to act like their name suggests and ask the voters. They are allowed to choose their own leaders any way they want, right? So instead of having a closed meeting secret vote to keep the same guy as last time, hold a non-binding referendum and mail special ballots out to every registered Democrat. Everyone can rank their top 10 and bottom 10 choices for the next Speaker of the House. They don’t have to commit to going with the popular winner but they do have to publish the results, and it would look bad on the leadership if they don’t pick someone in the overall top 3.

      • mcv@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        They kinda did. There has literally just been an election. Jeffries should have been primaried in it, but that never happened.

        • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          And now because of this one district we’re all stuck with Jeffries. Which is the issue being talked about by uen3.

          So no “kinda” and no “did”. A district got to put their two cents in for him, and that’s it.

          With the method proposed, every other party member would get a chance to put their two cents in as well.

          • mcv@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            You’re not automatically stuck with Jeffries. It’s not like the winner of that district automatically becomes speaker. The House is going to vote on it, and they could vote for someone else.

            Although I think there might be a risk of something really weird happening: I’m not certain about the rules, but if the entire house votes on this, it would be possible for Jeffries to become speaker with the support of a minority of Democrats and all Republicans who decide to vote for him in order to prevent a more progressive speaker. I have no idea if that’s possible or likely, but it would be terrible for his credibility if it happened.

            • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              All I was saying is your statement was wrong. The only people who could gate Jeffries, didn’t. And nobody else has had a chance to say otherwise, so there was no “kinda vote” in the same scope OP of this thread was talking about. Which makes OP’s suggestion a valid one, imo.