• TheDoctor [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    What does the last bit mean? The reservation was there, but previously not under tribal control because there was no legally recognized tribe?

      • MarxOverflow@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I would presume that they are talking about the federal bill Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Shab-eh-nay Band Reservation Settlement Act of 2023 and one in Illinois. If I’m understanding this correctly, after over a 100 years the Potawatomi band right to sovereignty as guaranteed by a 200 year old treaty is being debated in both the US congress and Illinois congress.

        Reading in to this makes me want to go to a protest in DeKalb county as according this NBC news

        Many residents who live next to the park oppose the plan, fearing construction of a casino or even a hotel would draw more tourists and lead to a larger, more congested community.

        “Myself and my family have put a lot of money and given up a lot to be where we are in a small community and enjoy the park the way that it is,” resident Becky Oest told a House committee in May, asking that the proposal be amended to prohibit construction that would “affect our community. It’s a small town. We don’t want it to grow bigger.”

        I’d want to tell them “Land back and I’ll go away.”