• neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    From what I’ve learned about eastern California, they have more in common with (parts of) Alabama than one might think.

    Not sure Mobile, AL would go along with this though; A wonderful place unfortunately surrounded by dearth.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      they have more in common with (parts of) Alabama than one might think.

      They do. Rural California is FULL of rednecks. They’re just outnumbered by the rest of us.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      Not a fan of Mobile myself. I think I have a weird prejudice because it reminds me of Oklahoma City. Beats hell out of Birmingham though!

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I might be biased from being a european who had only heard about the stereotypes, but was positively surprised when having to spend a week there.

    • WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      I live in California and I’ve heard the words “Eastern California” in this thread more times than I’ve ever heard it in my life.

      We’re only about 3-4 hours wide I say North and South are fine. Maybe two North’s for the reason you said.

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Not to mention Kansas city and Memphis which would also be a part of this state. It would probably be more urban than average considering it would encompass both of these major cities.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 days ago

    Should have an island in Alaska and Hawaii as well better give them all the water between the two states just to be fair.

  • shutz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I know this is mostly a joke, but I do think California is too big for its own good. Splitting it into Northern California, Southern California, and Eastern California (rename as needed) seems to make sense to me: it gives Eastern Californians a voice in the Senate, while also giving a separate voice to SF vs LA. I’m sure this would cause all sorts of other problems I’m not aware of, but what solution doesn’t?

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 days ago

      The issue with the current U.S. federal setup is that rural communities are massively over-represented in the Senate.

      1 senator in Montana represents around 650,000 people

      1 senator from California represents 19.4 million people.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    Eastern California, Oregon, Washington, and a big chunk of Idaho would want to be in the same state.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    Missouri will probably happily give up its share of Kansas City, though. Plus, if they set up toll roads, they won’t need taxes.