• makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s me. I watch a lot of movies and see arthouse stuff the public doesn’t care about and if something is a big enough train wreck occasionally I’ll see what’s going on (shout out to CATS). Though I have Regal Unlimited so I don’t “pay” for a ticket

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I go to the theater every Sunday morning to the earliest showings of that day.

    The theater chain in my town has a monthly subscription. $20/month and I can see 4 movies a week.

    I don’t always love the theater itself, but the experience of seeing movies in theaters is very different than watching at home and I love that feeling.

    I’m actively choosing to go to a new location in a dark room without distractions, to turn off my phone, to not speak, and to give the movie my full and complete attention. There’s something to that, which is hard for me to explain, but it changes my relationship to the movie.

    Sometimes people are shitty, talking or texting, but I find that it doesn’t actually happen much. Perhaps I has something to do seeing early movies, rather than prime time. I don’t know.

    Unless something happens to drastically alter my ability to enjoy the experience, I don’t foresee that I will ever stop going.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s good. I think you’re misunderstanding my post. The point is about people who whine about new movies, saying “nobody wants this” but then go out of their way to see it. It would be one thing if they were watching it at home and putting less effort in, but they will go to the theatre and put all that effort and money in for a movie they claim shouldn’t be made because nobody wants it

      • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I initially did but I saw you comment on another post clarifying. I opted to leave my comment up because the movie going experience is important to me and I wanted to share it with others. :)

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve started patronizing small art cinemas mainly because they’re free from contemporary Hollywood slop, show movies that don’t have a paint-by-numbers plot and have a low ticket price because they’re mostly state funded.

  • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I never used to like going to the cinema but then all I used to go and see were ‘blockbusters’

    Then I got a job working in an art deco cinema that showed art house type films and that made me enjoy the whole experience more

    Being able to have a pint whilst watching and the free tickets certainly helped

  • grill@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, that’s me. Over the last 10 years, I’ve watched 51 movies in theaters. Only a few of them were movies I actually wanted to see.

    I’m trying to stop doing this, but it’s hard because my friend group has terrible taste in movies, and they get upset if I don’t come along.

    This Thursday we’re going to see Avatar 3, and I have no interest in it. It’s also a very long movie and starts late at night. The next day I need to wake up early for a pretty important workday. I need to start standing up for myself more…

  • mundane@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t understand going to the movie theater at all. Except for the sound, every other aspect of the experience is worse than my own living room.

    • JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      For me, it’s a social activity where I can enjoy with close friends. I also don’t have a 4K TV or surround sound system, so the audio and visual quality is miles ahead in the theatre than my 1080p TN LCD flatscreen and Bluetooth speaker.

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Original Sony Bravia Z Series. Don’t even use the Bluetooth speaker. Yeah. Theaters definitely hit different than at home.

        And it definitely is a fun experience to see movies on the big screen.

        • JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Completely agreed. My TV is some cheap Akai 24" thing, but at least it’s a dumb TV with a built-in DVD player, so I still enjoy it. The speakers on it are absolutely garbage, so that’s why I bother with a separate speaker. I too live in very small housing and frequently move about, so having any kind of speaker system is just not feasible.

        • I got a modern 42 inch TV hooked up to an RCA stereo from the 90s with two big box speakers and I get that theatre sound right in my bedroom. A set like this is still only like $50-60 if you ca find 'em.

          You don’t need a 5 or 7 speaker system for perfect surround sound; just 2. Headphones might even sound better if you’re on a tight budget.

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Apartment living sucks. The walls here are cellophane thin. Headphones is the best I got.

      • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Do you reckon they might have been trying to spell another word? Gosh, but what word could it possibly be?? If only we could have ANY clues at all!!!

        • Agrivar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Bruh. “Laughs are on them” isn’t the right phrase regardless.

          (It’s supposed to be, “Joke’s on them.”)

          • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            If somebody said “laughs are on them”, you’re telling me you simply can’t understand what the sentiment that person is trying to get across is?

            Of course not; you clearly know what the phrase would be for native English speakers - well done - but I just don’t find much value in nitpicking easily ignored syntax or grammar issues honestly.

            • Agrivar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Do you want a “White Knight of the Year” award, or will simply blocking your weak ass be enough for you?