• Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The main reason I keep subs for any of it is because we have a Roku TV in the living room and anything more complicated than just pushing the Netflix button is more than my wife is willing to deal with. She already doesn’t like the Google TV box with the same apps on the other TV because she thinks it’s too complicated, but she puts up with it “because you like it”. If I had a way to install Stremio on the Roku, I could probably slowly convince her over to it, but that depends on how often her occasionally obscure TV preferences are already cached by RD.

    • lordziv@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Curious how you handle routing to your server/box, do you use something like cloudflare tunnels? Trying to get a seamless option for friends too but with jellyfin

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I have a domain name, one of its subdomains uses a clodflared tunnel to send traffic back to the emby server. No port forwarding on my router.

        Cloudflared tunnels are pretty easy to set up for this purpose.

        So my users just navigate to sub.domain.com.au, and are presented with an emby login screen, and I manage the users in emby. It works on most smart TVs too.

          • Agent641@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            If you have any trouble setting up CloudFlare tunnel, let me know with a PM. They have changed their UI layout AND the name of some of their UI menu items, which is super annoying because the current UI doesn’t match any recent written or video guides, and so now it’s very easy to miss certain important aspects of the setup of the tunnel and mapping the tunnel to a subdomain.

            I can at least give examples of what a working config tunnel path looks like and help troubleshoot.

            • lordziv@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Appreciate that I might take you up on that :) btw do you also use with tailscale or independently?

              • Agent641@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                No, I don’t use tailscale operationally.

                I have installed it on one of my servers to try to understand it, but it’s not in active use. One day when I have the time I’ll try to do more with it. I’d prefer to mode away from CloudFlare because I prefer foss where I can, but I’m not enough of a purist to insist on it when there’s something else that’s easier to use, and free.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Sail the high seas, then.

    Especially if it’s a great TV show or a movie and you really want to keep it.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    the main reasons are: cancelling seasons of good shows after 1,2, or 3 seasons, just to boost subscription numbers.

    limiting how much people can watch it on different devices, and increasing prices, with decreasing quality.

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Didn’t they announce they were going to enforce this years ago? That’s around the time I stopped giving them money

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      This one was always in place, the one they started enforcing a few years ago was the multiple households rule, which was slightly more draconian. I.e I paid for 4 screens, but then they decided the 4 screens all have to be in one physical household. Share it with your mum who lives 100 km away? You crazy?

      Incidentally, that’s when I cancelled it. I was ok being limited to 4 viewers at a time (which also cost extra), I usually had 2-3 at the same time, rarely 4. But being limited to one physical location? Fuck that.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      yes, but they probably do it in steps, at first you can have only a handful, and not unlimited, and now its 1 person/account/device.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just one reason their stock price is down. They no longer report subscriber numbers — you can probably guess why. It’s strange to me that a public company can just hide data from investors that might reveal when a company isn’t doing so hot.

    It’s also stupid they would clamp down like this on ad-supported plans. Advertisers want eyeballs, and this means less of them. Reminds me of Reddit moving to a log-in only model.

    https://www.fool.com/investing/2026/07/15/with-netflix-down-45-from-its-highs-viewer-engagem/

    https://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-engagement-data-earnings-subscribers-stock-wall-street-2026-7

    • Switorik@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I will never understand investors. Anyone with half a brain can put two and two together when a company starts hiding anything. Investors have no idea what they’re doing, they just trust the customer will make them money, get angry when they’ve been duped, and will do it again.

      • huppakee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not all investors are in it for the long run. Some just expect a short boost or go short betting on a loss.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        In this case, the ads are probably bringing in less per viewer than the service costs, so having non-paying viewers is still a net negative.

        Clamping down on this is probably a worse negative in the long run, but investors only care about this quarter.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Considering how many streamers are encouraging people to sign up for the ad-supported plans, I think they’re making more money from the ads. Of course, they’re double-dipping just like the cable companies used to do. Charging for a subscription, and then making even more money by showing you ads. The OP’s screenshot is like how they used to charge for each cable descrambler box in a home. Wanna watch in both the bedroom and the living room? Pay up!

          It’s just greed.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Part of it is greed. Part of it is that television and physical media subsidized a lot of streaming’s content and now that money is gone. There has already been a collapse of some types of movies and TV shows because the economics that led to their golden age are no longer there.

            Netflix used to get streaming rights for pennies because production companies made their money through other sources. Now those income streams are dead.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      the biggest reason is, them cancelling too many shows too soon. after 1-2 season, the show ceases to ecist. 3 if you are lucky and its thier way of forcing its end.

      • ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        One of the reasons I stopped watching Netflix shows was because all the ones I got invested those were cancelled just after one season.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          blood of zeus, sandman(eventhough its mostly finished, it felt like it wash rushed and cheaply made.) castlevania is one of the ones they kept around longer, who knows when nocturne will get renewed? the show isnt as good as the first series, albeit they have some foreshadowing for season 3.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Stranger Things finally ended and the price for no ads went over $20 per month. That’s what made me finally quit.

    • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      They aren’t stopping reporting subscriber numbers, what are you talking about? They’re dropping from reporting it twice a year to just once a year. Annual growth is really all that matters after all. What matters far more is revenue, profit, and cash flow - all of which are still reported regularly.

      Stock prices falling after earnings calls is basically the norm because no matter how well they go, even beating expectations, some people wanted more - and you can’t ignore the market manipulation by big players who try to manufacture drops so they can increase their position. Spook people to sell and drop the price so they can buy more at a reduced price.

      Netflix met or exceeded their targets as they have basically every single time for years. Their revenue grew double digits, their margins are getting healthier, and their viewing hours increased.

    • Hazzard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Advertisers want eyeballs, and this means less of them. Reminds me of Reddit moving to a log-in only model.

      Not sure if you’re being rhetorical, but I’ll answer anyways. The reason Reddit wants you to log in is to better track you, no duh. The reason that makes them more money is because better data means better ad targeting, and better ad targeting can be translated to results like a better click through rate. When a platform has that, they can incentivize more advertisers to spend more money on their platform.

      That way, each time they sell an ad, that ad can be more expensive. It’s undeniable that demanding logins will be bad for the number of ads they sell, but if they can sell higher quality ads, they’ll make more money at the end of the day.

      This whole thing is the core driver behind privacy being eroded at scale, because ad targeting has proven effective, and so advertisers want to advertise on the platform with the best targeting. So everyone wants to spy on their users the best and build the best targeting.

  • sudo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    To be fair, too many people are using your account. 0 people should be on it.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Exactly this. I had Netflix for a while and didn’t pirate for like, 5 years. Then they started cranking up the price, dramatically reducing available movies including old movies that I wanna rewatch, and telling me my family is not allowed to use the product I purchased. So fI just stopped and went back to the high seas with a renewed passion for making my own media library as extensive as possible, and giving access to friends, family, anyone remotely trustworthy.

    • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      I pay for Netflix and share with my sister in laws family and they pay for Hulu and Disney plus. Good trade off imo

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        None of that is a good trade off when you’re giving money to those shit companies.

        • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          I pretty much have every major streaming service and cable. I’m a sucker for tv content

          • k_rol@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s ok if you want to pay and share with others. Some people here are just a bit too extreme.

            I pay only for Canadian services, the rest is from the sea, it’s MY way to do it.

        • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          What’s the point of debrid of you have torrentio? It seems to have basically everything.

          I’ve never fully saw the value of debred, maybe I’m missing something.

          • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            The point is the almost guaranteed speed. With a debrid service I can stream and watch a 4K BluRay remux immediately with Stremio + Torrentio, no waiting, no buffering, no hitches. Sure a new or popular movie will work well without debrid but a lot of times older movies don’t stream well without a debrid especially high bit rate files.

          • sam@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Instead of torrenting on my ISP network or paying for a VPN, I pay for a debrid and they give me a high quality fast link to download without torrenting.

  • vithigar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 days ago

    I cancelled my Netflix several years ago literally the very first time I got an error that too many people were watching or a screen wasn’t authorized or whatever the specific “you can’t share your account anymore” error was at the time.

    The fact that account sharing was tacitly allowed was literally the only thing keeping the value proposition of having the account afloat.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 days ago

      The fact Netflix used to actually use sharing accounts as PROMOTIONAL MATERIAL is wild to me. They leaned healily into it.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 days ago

      Same here. I barely used Netflix and was only paying the bill because I shared the password with family members and didn’t want to cut them off.

      Once they started being weird about account sharing, there was no reason to keep paying the bill. I was on the top tier too, because they said you could play on 4 screens at once, and I figured it was fair to pay extra since I was sharing the account.

      Nobody in my family complained so it’s likely they weren’t really using it either. So instead of a top-tier account being shared among a bunch of people that didn’t really use it, they get nothing.