Why is this not already covered by existing laws?
Voice likeness is a legit slippery slope. More than one person have the same tone of voice.
It is more about AI based voice replication that people sounding similar.
YouTube won’t really care which it is when it gets the take down request though.
That is a good fucking point. Of course, it would be trivial for YouTube to do the tiniest amount of due diligence, but they won’t unless they have to.
So this means they delete all poor people’s accounts, and only reverse it for rich people
Also appearance because doppelgangers are a thing.
Though these aren’t examples of slippery slopes but just exceptions to the normal expectation (that everyone is unique). A slippery slope is something that supposedly creates a trend that, if followed to the end, would supposedly result in obviously bad rules being implemented. Eg, “If we reduce the drinking age from 21 to 19 today, tomorrow they’ll want to reduce it to 17, and eventually 5 year olds will be old enough to drink!” They are logical fallacies because the current step doesn’t imply any future steps will happen or any trend will be followed beyond the current change.
Didn’t that pass half a year ago?
Edit Ah it didn’t pass so they brought it a second time
I have such mixed feelings about the Danish government right now.
In the one hand they’re sticking it to the tech companies, but on the other hand they’re the ones who drafted the chat control proposal, and have recently put a motion to remove or reduce SU for students.
This is a great idea in the age of ai
This can fuck right off if it doesn’t meaningfully protect freedom of the press which includes private peoples’ ability to record and share things in public
