she’s gorgeous in both?
The makeup version looks hideous to me but that is my personal opinion. Very overdone.
I think she looks even prettier in the right photo Idk what the problem is
For the uninformed: this is a direct response to a post saying that obtaining sex by deception is sexual assault. Which, y’know, it is.
No, makeup doesnt fucking count you unmitigated arsehole.
This sums up my opinion of the manosphere…
calling the woman a female is a telltale sign its an incel.
Maybe it’s cultural, but “woman” can sound “old” to some people, and “girl” can sound “young”.
Some guys think its respectful to sidestep the whole issue and use an age neutral term, unaware of how it sounds.
From my personal experience, those who aims to be respectful just say woman.
from my personal experience
Yes, exactly.
I’m telling you as a matter of fact that I know people who felt awkward saying “woman” because of the age factor.
These guys aren’t incels by any means, they’re just awkward and naive.
For what it’s worth I did tell them that “female” is not a good look, and they should use “women” instead.
The point is not every guy who says “female” is an incel.
Damn I hate it when I get seduced by women wearing makeup, it’s the worst thing ever, I hope it doesn’t happen this weekend.
Why else, throughout history, have women been blamed just for being attractive?
“No, I raped you! It’s your fault for being sexy!”
So she looks great without makeup, what’s the problem?
DLSS 5 ON vs OFF lol
More like DLSS 5 OFF vs ON
If you’re saying she looks better without, yea, I agree
What a wild way to say you’ve never been with a woman before
I am crazy or is she not way more attractive without the makeup?
My husband just said, “If you think the one on the right is not an attractive woman, maybe you’re gay. Like, you should just be looking for dudes.”
Maybe she’s not your exact type, but surely we can all agree that she very much fits the bill for what a large majority of people would traditionally consider pretty.
I am personally not a fan of the highly-made-up trend, so I do think that she’s more attractive without the makeup. But I also understand why people like wearing makeup, and it’s her right to do it or not depending on her mood. I think anyone who can’t tell that she’s wearing makeup in the photo on the left is (a) lying or (b) a child.
Part of it is she’s authentically smiling and joyful without the makeup instead of doing that forced neutral “Paris Hilton” kind of look with the make-up.
Turns out when people are happy and in a good mood they’re more attractive. Who knew?
It’s almost liberating to realize that beauty is not the same as attractiveness.
Someone can look below average, but have a shining, friendly personality that makes them attractive as hell!
No matter the gender, either- I’m not a particularly handsome man, but I can tell you that sparking joy works.
You do realise you’re not winning ‘good man’ points by saying stuff like this, right? You’re literally just adding to the misogyny here by further objectifying women.
Very few people in this thread are capable of understanding that offering judgment on this woman’s appearance is still objectifying her.
I am getting so tired of the internet lately. I appreciate seeing you around but idk how you still have the will to talk to any of these people, the toxicity of these men is starting to feel like I’m stewing in poison.
Speaking up when I see casual sexism like this helps heal the years of my life when I was taught to be quiet and allow “boys to be boys”.
It’s really understandable how people get sick of seeing this type of toxicity. I hope your day has more good, funny, quirky, weird, and fun things pop up instead of gestures at this thread
Attractiveness is subjective.
This is true. Attractiveeness is also mathematical. Symmetry and having average facial structures also play a role too.
Not crazy… She is way more attractive w/o the makeup.
Women usually are.
Came here to say this. Upvote wasn’t enough.
Left looks like generic vapid bimbo, like what you would get if you typed ‘vapid bimbo’ in gen AI.
Right looks like a person.
The makeup makes her ugly.
Another example of “Everyone is twelve now.”
Yeah kiddo, I know you’re surprised women look different when we put on makeup. You’re twelve!
I wonder if he still feels deceived by peekaboo
This is why I can’t talk to most men for more than a minute.
Conservatives will show you two pictures of a conventionally attractive person looking conventionally attractive, and then caption it some bs like “the age of men has fallen.”
incels need to be stopped
Well, it’s not like they’re reproducing. Just give it a few years.
sadly it wont work like that
they wont have children and raise incels, but tw*tter will still raise incels from others’ children
incelism is a social-media-borne disease to which people raised to be bigots are susceptible
Sadly, you’re right. They reproduce asexually, like slime molds, and nuns.
imagining a tw*tter incel mitosis-ing
or giving birth to a miniature clone of itself
female
Quick, someone post the Ferengi!
I don’t know what I’m doing.
that’s on me, i wasn’t specific enough
So you can’t tell she’s wearing a makeup?
The post seems like a retort to something some woman might have posted, saying something like, “If he doesn’t tell you he’s poor, when hitting on you, that’s sexual assault.”. There are quite a few to and fro comments like this visible in those spaces.
I don’t know “those spaces,” but that seems like trolling to me.
Not sure how well that would match the definition of trolling, but the template usually is:
Side A: Says something that people call correct. Side B: Says something that people call absurd, but then realise how that correlates to what Side A previously said. This make people realise the absurdity of what Side A said.
This template has quite a few similarities to little witty fable-like stories that were available in children’s books, which ended up helping children develop some level of critical thinking while also being entertaining.
Continue reading for an example story that might not be fun to read, because I am not a very good writer…
The king was once walking around his kingdom’s streets when he overheard a drunk guy boasting off how he can stay neck-deep in lake water the whole night in winter. The next day, the guy was summoned to court and offered treasure on the condition that he would do the same. The guy went to the said lake and stayed there the whole night and came back the next day to receive his reward.
When the king asked, how he managed the feat, the guy said that he looked at the burning lamps in the temple on the other side of the lake and got heat from it all night. The king then went on saying that the guy had cheated and proceeded to not give the treasure.
A few days later, the court jester invited the king to dinner at his house. When the king arrived, the jester said that the food was not ready yet and would take some while.
After a few hours of waiting the king went into the kitchen to find the jester. The jester had hung the pot off of a high tree branch in the backyard and had a bonfire under the tree.Looking at the vertical distance between the pot and the fire, the king had the obvious response of telling the jester how it would be impossible to cook the food with that method, to which the jester responded by saying that it should be possible considering how the guy in the winter lake managed to get heat from a temple 100s of metres away.
