• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    What about this vote was “key”? It’s like one of many votes none of which will result in anything before the new congress takes office on January 3rd.

    • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      How nice of them to put themselves on the list of people for serious Americans to vote against next election so early in the cycle. I thought it would take a few months for them to make themselves this known.

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 hours ago

      On its face, this seems like a dirty trick by Republicans. Mike Johnson called a recess, then after members left, called a snap vote on whether to proceed with impeachment with no warning. This entire spectacle reeks of a planned Republican scheme to try to influence the outcome through procedure and sow division within the Democratic party. The Republican House caucus was obviously made aware this was happening so they would stick around.

      That any House Speaker can call a snap vote like this is a serious problem for our democracy.

    • Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So, the israelis threw a party way the fuck in nowhere right before a critical vote, and there just happened to be a huge traffic jam blocking their only path back to vote?

      So, throw a party then crash a truck to continue their war of genocide uninterrupted. It’s what their fictional gawd told them to do. Everything is justified by a fictional being that lives in their religious psychopathy.

  • 23lonestar@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It wasn’t an impeachment vote. It was a vote to send it to committee which is what the Republicans wanted to delay. The vote was moved up and closed early by Johnson. In all honesty, any impeachment needs to be done in January because it will actually pass the Senate and Dems would control the approval of the nomination.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      I’m actually not sure it will pass the senate even after we get 54 DNC Senators in because I’m pretty sure it’s still 60 to remove even though it was 50 + VP to confirm? It’s a little confusing.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Because Johnson. He was aware people were en route and closed the vote.

        Its also misleading, its “some of the 11”. Pelosi was in CA for a veterans day event, another was going in for a medical procedure, another had an unrelated (and unspecified) personal emergency, like 4 said they were stuck in traffic (motorcade blocking traffic), and I think it was 2 at the AIPAC event.

        Not excusing anything here BTW, just pointing out the title is kinda shitty.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I mean, everyone not being in attendance can’t automatically delay votes, or anyone could unilaterally block a vote by just not showing up. However, I think we all know why the vote was moved up and closed early - it’s specifically because they were stuck in traffic.

        • Darkonion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They shouldn’t have needed to be at a specific location to vote for more than 100 years… How is it still allowed to be an excuse.

          • barnacles@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            Alternatively

            Having been required to be at a specific location to vote for more than 100 years is probably a good reason to be at the location

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    These people are miscreants of the worst kind for this. In addition, though, maybe we should update the rules so people don’t have to be in one fucking building all at the same time in order for our government to function. We have the technology, people. We can make it better, faster, and stronger than what it is now.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Actually, I’d like to keep it that way for now. These fuckers use Microsoft for their confidential emails. I don’t want to imagine the huge security issues they’d create in voting for budgets and legislation.

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Budgets and Legislation are all televised on CSPAN already. It’s public information. For the super secret war plans, they use the ultra-secure Signal app.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        I probably won’t because this particular vote was in fact pointless and inconsequential. New congress doesn’t enter office until Jan 3rd.

  • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Oh look, the controlled opposition reared its ugly head even faster than I thought.

    Voting matters, but not just at the main elections. Building a party that is a coherent vision is needed too. The D have their own corruption to weed out.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) was in San Francisco attending a Veterans Day celebration, where she was being honored for her advocacy on behalf of veterans.

    “Speaker Emerita Pelosi returned to San Francisco to join and honor local veterans at Swords to Plowshares’ 30th Annual Veterans Day Celebration tonight, an important and longstanding district tradition she regularly attends and will mark for the last time as a Member of Congress by receiving the Lifetime Advocate for Veterans Award,” Pelosi spokesperson Ian Krager told The Sun.

    Uh huh. Okay then.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      I blame Hakeem Jeffries, minority leader, and Katherine Clark, Democratic Whip.

      Clark is even in the same group that some of the missing members attended a meeting of before getting stuck in traffic during the vote.

      Also, it didn’t matter, this vote was meaningless.