Text description: screen cap of a post from @hexadecibelle.bsky.social:

reminder: Harry Potter tattoos have a higher regret rate than trans surgeries and that’s very funny actually

  • maniii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just because an Author has some bad takes doesn’t have to sour the franchise for you. On principle, you can move on and still carry the enjoyment of your experience. Chalk the author up as “gone cuckoo” or something and don’t spoil your initial reactions and interpretations.

    Life is all about what you feel, experience and reminisce over. And no one can take that from you. While facts cannot change, your feelings do evolve over time and something you can and should look forward to.

      • Nyonnyan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        4 months ago

        The difference between Lovecraft and Rowling is, lovecraft doesnt make a profit off of his stuff anymore

        • umbraroze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 months ago

          Also, Lovecraft had good relationships with other authors and collaborated with them, and effectively made the Cthulhu mythos open source before that was cool. Rowling on the other hand…

        • Iapar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          Also, as far as I know, Lovecraft came around and said he was an idiot for being racist.

          On the other hand Lovecraft stories work because he was racist. Fear of the unknown etc.

          That is the true horror. That something good came from racism and xenophobia.

          • Lyre@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            4 months ago

            “On the other hand Lovecraft stories work because he was racist. Fear of the unknown etc.”

            Well when you get right down to it, the wizarding world of harry potter only really functions because of the author’s hardcore belief in the importance of the status quo and the existence of groups of people who are inherently evil… Not saying the premise wouldn’t have worked without that but it would have been a really different story

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              4 months ago

              Also the belief that some groups are inherently superior or gifted. Not a great look in context!

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          And he hardly made profit off it to begin with. I would bet most HP tattoos will outlive Joan.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Here’s a spoiler for you; you don’t have to pay JKR, even indirectly.

          Buy used books or pirate movies / games so she doesn’t get the benefits.

      • Shyfer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        As do fans of the Ender’s Game and Ender’s Shadow series.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Are there fans of the actual series? Enders game is pretty good, speaker for the dead was annoying but I saw the point, but I physically tossed xenocide across the room at one point. Just absolutely awful.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Nostalgia critic on yt made a good point about death of the author and how it doesn’t necessarily apply when it comes to Rollo. It’s difficult to separate her from her art because she still profits extensively from the product she created and uses that money to fund anti - trans organizations. It’s not so simple as separating the work from the artist in this case.

    • alx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      except the blatant racism, transphobia, homophobia, slavery apology, and other things are in the actual books

      • kyle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not sure transphobia or homophobia were in the actual books, but the others you mentioned were. Rowling herself obv exhibits all of those things, but I try to think of OP as a 9 year old just discovering a love of reading, who doesn’t know about the racist tones. That’s my story at least, and I’ve been happier just letting people enjoy things.