• SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This is why I just use “friend” to refer to everyone.

    All genders inclusive, respectful, friendly. Don’t have to try and figure anything out.

    “Hey, friend”,

    “Pardon, friend”,

    “Thanks, friend”,

    Simple

  • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    A few of these remind me of their usage in customer support, and boy I hate them already before getting into the actual transmeme.

  • Cargon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I don’t have many trans people in my life and I always stumbled over my words when I found myself in a position where I had to address them in the third person.

    My most awkward memory is a conversation with my friend where I addressed her as “my wee lass”.

    Anyway, we’re married now and expecting our third Calico.

      • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Someone said “yes, king” to me once and I didn’t like it, mostly because I’m uncomfortable thinking of myself as royalty :/

        But yas Queen I’m immune to bc of Rupaul.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s unfortunate so many terms of endearment are gendered. Habibi/habibti, ése, khouia, fra

    The aussies really had it right when they decided to call everyone cunt

    • SpiralCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I was thinking about this recently and I feel like maybe people use gendered terms of endearment is because they’re gender affirming. The gendered aspect is not a side effect. Affirming someone’s gender is a nice thing to do and feels nice to have it done to you and our language reflects this.

      The obvious corollary is that it is the addressee that gets to decide what terms of endearment are gender affirming for them, not the person addressing them. There are too many people that insist they’re being gender neutral when they say “dude” because their associations with the word are not gendered, but what they should be doing is bothering to ask what the person they’re talking to would find affirming and using that.

      The term you use is for the person you’re addressing not for you, and you should want them to feel good about it. If someone tells you they don’t like being called dude because they find it gendered, you should fucking stop calling them dude.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If someone tells you they don’t like being called dude because they find it gendered, you should fucking stop calling them dude.

        Forget gender, if someone doesn’t like being called something, don’t call them that. It’s one of those cases where respecting trans people is the same action as basic human decency.

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    That’s why you gotta hit em with the “homie”, “home slice”, “big dawg”, “amigo”, “boss”, or “friendo”.

    • TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      They might actually enjoy those. I found best effect by using something else that they might consider diminutive. Kiddo, sport, Buck, “little man”. If they get too upset, you can always pass it off as, “oh, sorry. That’s what I call my sibling/kid/nephew” etc. Which is the same bullshit reasoning they tend to give us “oh sorry, it’s just how you look though.”

    • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      The 80’s and 90’s were my formative years, so “my dudes” has taken on a gender-agnostic meaning in my view (anecdotal evidence alert), so much so that I address whoever I’ve got in my team for a given day:

      • A team full of guys? “Good morning my dudes”;

      • A team of mostly guys and some women? “Good morning my dudes”;

      • A team of mostly girls and one or two guys? “Good morning my dudes”;

      • A team full of girls? “Good morning my dudes” (maybe “dudettes” but then I feel I’m making an exception based on gender which seems demeaning, so dudes is safer);

      • A team of a guy, a girl, a rabbit in a hat, and a dog? “Good morning my dudes”;

      • A team full of Avril Lavignes? “hey hey you you I don’t like your girlfriend”;

      • A team full of people I don’t know because it’s dark? “Good morning my dudes”.

      I am a simple person.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I think it is more acknowledging the shift in some English words from their strictly gendered origins.

        How this affects you and your own feelings is entirely personal, but I do think the important message is that if someone uses one of these words they likely are not attaching gender to it. While this may not alleviate your dysphoria, I think it’s nice to know people aren’t misgendering you but instead are using previously gendered words in a gender neutral way.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’d say if its an individual in your life that you have told to not refer to you that way then yes.

            If it is a stranger, particularly a younger stranger, then assuming misgendering is probably going to not be linguistically accurate and cause you uneccessary mental distress.

            I think the increased neutrality of previously gendered words is overall a good thing.

              • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Gotcha, I misinterpreted your meaning there. I thought the indication was people should be educated to know and found that impractical.

                We’re on the same page

        • pooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You misunderstood me, I think. My reply was about their phrasing. “Should’ve taught” makes it sound like the onus is on me to idk watch Good Burger (which I have seen, and I understand the reference, by the way) and feel some great relief.

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Dude would not abide people who intentionally try to make someone else’s day shit. Live and let’s bowl, I say.

    To be serious though, you are valid and deserve courtesy, understanding, and respect. I hate that people do that. Especially those around us.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What does this mean? The character looks very androgynous and could be either male or female, trans or cis. Is this referring to how gender-neutral-looking people get assumed to be male?

    • werty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I thought the picture was a woman, not even a little bit androgynous. Interesting how interpretations vary.

    • moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a custom character in Baldur’s Gate 3. Gender isn’t determined by appearance in the game, but this is definitely a base model used for female characters. If we could zoom out a bit, you’d see some extremely improbable breasts sticking out.

      Zoom out a little more and there are lots of options for what could be downstairs. But as far as I know the NPCs that use this base model are exclusively female. So as far as the meme is concerned, I believe it’s supposed to look outwardly like a woman.

  • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ve noticed this on my main page and am here to get educated: what is the meme about?

    I’m assuming the meme is about her being male presenting and hit with male pronouns from strangers who assume the gender visually, while the OP would prefer to be addressed by female pronouns (I’m not sure how said strangers should know that though, but that’s not the meme point)?

    Or is it a meme about being stuck in the process and however she tries she’s still male presenting for reasons unknown to her?

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s often less about how one actually presents and more about people who know you refusing to change how they refer to you. People who knew you before often don’t change how they think of you until forced to reconcile with it. Until they see AND accept that you’re incontrovertibly feminine, they’ll keep calling you sir even if most new people who meet you call you ma’am.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Thanks, appreciate it.

        It could be cognitive bias (because of the words around it), but the girl on the screenshot does look a bit manly to me (but it also can be lighting, angle, makeup, hair, scales and horns; after all those are the tools of drag)